From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S5gms-00073F-QT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:05:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21FF8E08FE; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2491E08AD for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so648993wgb.10 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:04:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=B0J6vw3yDw/mIbfJ95U/WVQvXrINdMKDPFP3GSm9CIo=; b=twc4sQXv1eHbffnTRCoNNSre/N9EjysoL0l849r7f2xH1SNFJVU3jAIAKTwUsYCekC 7OfN8yX3Cg/d1AqM+7w4W0fNI2+qIvTfKBzbeeUzfVFILAwWw8YvXMR24J1MfjifRrbs +0vd+ckHvJquZz8xWIbbcfuHp5rbhf8opGrXVaR8/vyhiRpfn7mBXfz29fhS0M+qqBBj nvf5xb/MTPV/I1v+JS5pUP3VA2pLUvEZs/YuogzI6yXe+iw8YHTNqtr2C1dHG26WTlj/ VQDf19wUTKgPvrqBALx9twhKx4Rql584vAt8gzEW08TtcRV3rRYokyffGFwpoOopTGuv +TrA== Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr36307282wiw.18.1331226290132; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:04:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm46433556wic.0.2012.03.08.09.04.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:04:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:03:42 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds Message-ID: <20120308170342.7d36d75e@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <1331225973.4519.21.camel@rook> References: <20311.51166.725757.212932@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20312.24445.451487.577826@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4F58CFE3.8070408@gentoo.org> <4F58DCA1.2040000@gentoo.org> <20120308162902.4bc8e352@googlemail.com> <1331225973.4519.21.camel@rook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/B4e1J.+jpx8MKWnAeAOyNUh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8c75e18c-bcaf-45c7-994a-1b6e189b8c29 X-Archives-Hash: 4e31c8cbbfafd1ffefa7b2ed97d5436f --Sig_/B4e1J.+jpx8MKWnAeAOyNUh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:59:33 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 16:29 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > And you believe that having exactly one place inside ebuild text > > where there are different whitespace, quoting and indenting rules > > for something that otherwise looks exactly like any other metadata > > variable isn't going to cause problems? >=20 > In light of the fact that all 29758 ebuilds in portage already satisfy > the proposed whitespace, quoting, and indenting constrains on EAPI > assignment, the probability of problems appears to be vanishingly > small. And "vanishingly small" and can be reduced to zero by simply > adding a check to repoman. Because they were recently changed, presumably... https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D402167#c36 We had this discussion the last time around too, and people were told to assign in a particular way. As you can see, it didn't work. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/B4e1J.+jpx8MKWnAeAOyNUh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9Y5nIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHvVACdGhKCuWmrUeaEoCQQWVenLkG3 uoMAnjZTK4zsiu5SA7diNuNjApO+43Vd =iIyM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/B4e1J.+jpx8MKWnAeAOyNUh--