From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S5Nkk-0005UD-CE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:46:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4E29E063F; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B3FE060C for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wico1 with SMTP id o1so3589273wic.40 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:45:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=Se4j5+sXMxbKGeSZpNMgqzdtgePzj8n1guIVLcZlZ24=; b=V9VW8VgvkS8vc3QTfHiKlwe0Q9CNPIrqhxDCxnKw31zkG19Xtl/ZVgvhjmbgNbnVtb vT/Iyx8MOYRBDwErxRPENTWgxidsRGrp7ugh1aBeVtVVwwdQIGovDY0KR2lUNsL4kA+C REpiKN1vKZODIv/zvM9YnEaPX+UTZyjF2DloX573ttzcXM3UVcIEOyyddTTQRYM2t6YL eEgw6kiTehZYcjtiCYlXD8awExOIKovoEOL/tbYKKSpfNtq0wA7YL68wmiOZ1N1sgSfL f4kY9zoA+JEVwe9HZ0M1IInO5cXI7hVFfva/9qJArsPfTB8J5be69IYM75Tr1WHE7RYi Vd8g== Received: by 10.216.131.232 with SMTP id m82mr1706705wei.71.1331153135322; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:45:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h19sm38429170wiw.9.2012.03.07.12.45.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:45:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:44:28 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds Message-ID: <20120307204428.3118997e@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20311.51166.725757.212932@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20311.51166.725757.212932@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/YKunBXq5HLP=lPI/JqD+d4n"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: de82592b-7116-434f-b8fd-4f2da73ad6b4 X-Archives-Hash: 99dd50acc84a648b97451640126beda0 --Sig_/YKunBXq5HLP=lPI/JqD+d4n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:41:02 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > (I really hope for a constructive discussion here. So, if you want > to comment that all of the above proposals suck and GLEP 55 is much > superior, then please open a new thread for it.) I think if you want a constructive discussion, then you should ignore the previous Council's decision and reconsider all the solutions that have been presented. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/YKunBXq5HLP=lPI/JqD+d4n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9XyK8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHOcwCgvsRdt/bTsgCr9/Om1wsuKLlq jHQAn00sPnC/uSdnuK8pRS7j2nQZ4STc =utb/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/YKunBXq5HLP=lPI/JqD+d4n--