From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S4txk-0006Em-Lm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:57:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6FDBE0F82; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AECE0F47 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [67.58.189.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: titanofold) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 157081B400E for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 07:56:52 -0500 From: "Mr. Aaron W. Swenson" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used Message-ID: <20120306125651.GA10167@atrus.grandmasfridge.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1331030775.7159.4.camel@belkin4> <4F55F4D7.20402@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F55F4D7.20402@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 3679b4d1-a373-42af-8c7a-cdd5312d9666 X-Archives-Hash: 21df0e433ab0767cb9535d3d6f803c9e --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:28:23PM +0100, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 3/6/12 11:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > What do you think? >=20 > I second removing a possibly spammy warning. >=20 > Maybe provide a way in the ebuild to silence it (if it makes sense), but > I'm fine either way. >=20 I get the warning for 'en en_US' as well for packages that are native English and don't need the translation. So, it doesn't actually make sense to warn about 'en en_US' not being supported. --=20 Mr. Aaron W. Swenson Gentoo Linux Developer, Proxy Committer Email : titanofold@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0 GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk9WCZMACgkQVxOqA9G7/aBNWQD/fnjLJgSUhhV08sJouvi0oVi/ IlRxl5t1i8ChxiwUwNkBAJ6XLW2306x8IPqMpgxU8uodNl2RcZeibu7l8+21RqY9 =fkLq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--