From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49911-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1S108B-0000tc-2e
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:44:35 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07397E0B36;
	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6260FE0F2E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:43:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.89.69.133])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: aballier)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D6041B400A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:43:33 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:43:27 -0300
From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy
Message-ID: <20120224154327.61c051ad@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org>
References: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 0b957842-46f4-4d3a-986e-68dd3beee88f
X-Archives-Hash: 07e3d5a106d98db6dab845ef27e3b7ea

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:56:44 +0100
""Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Currently preserve_old_lib functions generate two commands per
> preserved lib:
>=20
> # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
> # rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
>=20
> I'd like to modify eutils.eclass to only generate one command:
>=20
> # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' && \
> 	rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
>=20
> What do you think?
>=20

+1

moreover the && wont delete the lib if revdep-rebuild failed i think,
so it should be even safer to copy/paste :)

A.