From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RwCy3-00047T-Gv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:26:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF8FCE06F7; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01635E06B5 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [87.204.190.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D8341B400E; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:27:20 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: lxnay@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml Message-ID: <20120211142720.6d75db72@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/oGs.k4md5E7shFbFb1otnSI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e33b1906-ca97-40cc-9c00-388f1e3eec1d X-Archives-Hash: f02a2380e3a993cbe253fe6c1ea3e25c --Sig_/oGs.k4md5E7shFbFb1otnSI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani wrote: > I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe > I'm wrong. > Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application > name) to packages. > Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to "LibreOffice Writer" in package > metadata. >=20 > How about expanding metadata.xml (adding to its .dtd) to also support > this? It would be nice to show this info in GUI package managers > instead of the actual, and ugly (for the newbies), CP or CPV. > It would be just a small addition that would make a big diff. I think we already expand the name in DESCRIPTION whenever it is ambiguous. Could you please mention some Gentoo examples which would benefit from the proposed change? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/oGs.k4md5E7shFbFb1otnSI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk82bMMACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3RXgQAj6cVfQNn3yNjI6+PMlGl2n8w qnOh2xB9yAeq/AH5G+ObGFuBwKeR0BKlCmK1MqtR3XdkNqrLdp8IJjFqVuLwSzL7 zqaSKqoasUnKNnauuG1vBIhUowcyKH0/03vRweKtGJy3K8+Lbb9VGA5/6jd+Ahkf sapzKDyiR2xdgxXU73U= =oq/n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/oGs.k4md5E7shFbFb1otnSI--