From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt6L5-0008BT-DZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:45:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADB61E071E; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 23:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05528E055C for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 23:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F421B4009 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 23:44:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages masked for lack of maintainer, but metadata.xml says otherwise Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:44:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4F2B1490.2010108@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F2B1490.2010108@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1972394.U3BDsQLWjZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202021844.35404.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b8e48819-a5c9-4ea1-8754-0da0dbf3a978 X-Archives-Hash: 8d1d68a69fccf05d68540a7ad6731a64 --nextPart1972394.U3BDsQLWjZ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB= =85n wrote: > there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of > maintainer. However, their metadata.xml does not list > maintainer-needed@g.o which I think should be the first step in > searching for a new maintainer. if there is no and no , then "maintainer-needed@g.o" is= =20 implicit. why do we need to explicitly list it ? =2Dmike --nextPart1972394.U3BDsQLWjZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPKx/jAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBBb0P/2Y3o8CTreHDbHQJPC7sBW3Q It6UCEHjiLHBxUo7Jza0HEXHyKPsA4I2CTnhsY2bKrRqSKPL1h/nKsFvt87I7CXn 4uF4VAQB9SOSxTS9duLdA6HvSV0APccmm+TIfq4EqOXOqxYFCerFgfqAfNP5itFq 4Yz2qBvJ3eXrShYrK0KxAXxNP8Pm0FCrosRvmG1IHvZcQ8qxKxvuBhTwwnBPZjOc anQXblJEW05Ty/918CH0PjHfka0METerlASFfa62xNCMqar1wslhFOsNEh+ANB3G n6RzFQXI1Azy/YeLyo0JbbiFcMdeHT921K42Xdv4ET7nyhERMfGLOD+xVqC5JDWB cBqiQgqCsWEM55Fy4Vi9l7V0rjDbOTUW2Iq4VOBNEueP2o+fWws+PRCQz759wTpo XT2HDCqT7HwQikKrRlepg5l0pX5F9PndUzflG7WiVhrkxF/aGmJnAd1nCMjNbUPM vCTEMpQ1Ak2Zfj7/Vd7mioZugmgPvF6067vYfl3ndY8ZqBey0j7txI9jQ8sc9YGg n7/eQEuxJcTjDSlEo7pDP+h8W/G61UsGA4F+6j83/WMuzzcAbKTNhfZURyjpXpvj aZNaE3GHg3mXqFwQPZZqcF6s5azq1fPXRZ+Up3nj++MZySV3+7Gu/sFsMDpqyc0M gZ67J5Rc9YExeIj/ekq9 =VzLq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1972394.U3BDsQLWjZ--