From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RraGB-0005Sk-5S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:17:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC83CE091E; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6C4E08CE for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E901B4005 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:16:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20261.11226.752406.675230@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <20261.11226.752406.675230@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3543412.9P19TMjMtD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201291416.15106.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6c1bf344-91bb-4bb1-9c47-eda8e3687982 X-Archives-Hash: 0fa7bc2b3225f0be4419ac456f247b91 --nextPart3543412.9P19TMjMtD Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 29 January 2012 06:22:02 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > epatch_user() currently looks into / subdirectories > of /etc/portage/patches. If the package has no revision, then PF and P > are identical, so there's no way to specify that a patch should only > apply to -r0. >=20 > The patch below changes ${PF} to ${P}-${PR}. Behaviour should be > identical for all non-zero revisions. For -r0 it will look in ${P}-r0 > first, then in ${P} and ${PN}, as before. looks fine. gogogogogogogogo. =2Dmike --nextPart3543412.9P19TMjMtD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPJZr/AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBaiAQAN4rGyLoJHxDyQIc7Ywh65LF 9+s5I1hrxaY3errg2lLXqGP/GQtIC8R8f9RHMHpxS1RlkvAkhx/vnKjVr6APAtbc cpCAa0Z7j9BrGN0/K1qGz2tirRj6YqceQATHQIxivaGn1cRnS5+xnB9JfFj5Wn+Y NfBHaqC5JsYN9fhp4jKtoDhENelds/l/Giibxq2+zvOGw+oEBEhWbobDfv+0MbSF 11drS8LVHin/C1Hs+4LEjkf2933DMlie55i+qFW+esdQoSoWFwwVKzJk3bURfm7O qGgD6Q9cybkXmw6gsgfsC6iRpI+3CuNbGDy3KNM9j+tH6G+1YtluZwgLdEDhuQtE v9EwOvH5xMAwnDcrYsudrhnvQ5EA7kgsgeZEikt/zZlrBMlTr4aedbEQDriLvkhA 9h07MsDlupFgHyG4ZPOpRv5DCdEBiPb6VMBGal+kSVgFekddGInwPJJrl1wEMz7b rWscSY+Zr82xWu7I7PzSC8MXPFT0ykNi1OOHqaIDMW62sa7/PjqmlmgAg6QXFP72 nCzC/5tk7GJvLaI9lHC268KWgqms/xLQ70btF6CGpKzmF3adqKrb9zOMG/JMGb28 0ZKst6wPLOS+Sbx/ejPZbspv3yo6KvAgbPy+33zMAzHZSbfHuoBvK0MYOw0QDhii PeaFVgPv5YBsJ5O3AwH9 =hPLE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3543412.9P19TMjMtD--