From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqrke-0004VV-RT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:46:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B471DE0805; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D456E07F4 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqrjk-0004Eu-Oa for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:45:29 +0100 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:45:27 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? Message-ID: <20120127194527.GT71369@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <201201240058.50060.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F22FD6C.2020807@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jZnw8Q/DKt8Pu8HW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F22FD6C.2020807@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.2.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: a1a4264e-89b6-4bdd-a5ab-586f6c36328d X-Archives-Hash: 9893f69355746078241f22feed84bc79 --jZnw8Q/DKt8Pu8HW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27-01-2012 20:39:24 +0100, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > If the discussion on this doesn't get conclusive, how about adding the > question to the Council's agenda? Negative from my point of view, this is an issue that the dev-community can solve themselves without needing a "force" from the Council. Just implement it in a way that people can opt-in/opt-out on it. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --jZnw8Q/DKt8Pu8HW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk8i/tcACgkQX3X2B8XHTomDvgCfbZtY37hu67WYYrXYBorjneAk 4y0An1YmW0ddKdOwsSfXDV5bIK5mXuv8 =mUv3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jZnw8Q/DKt8Pu8HW--