From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkgi4-0000A1-U2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:46:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6000F21C081; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7039921C01F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (178-37-166-99.adsl.inetia.pl [178.37.166.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AE6D641F7; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:46:40 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: weigelt@metux.de Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Message-ID: <20120110194640.7696d2c7@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120110181452.GA14155@mailgate.onlinehome-server.info> References: <4F0440B3.4090500@gentoo.org> <20120106160719.GB18959@fury> <201201080047.27281.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <20120108103345.382b8db3@pomiocik.lan> <20120110181452.GA14155@mailgate.onlinehome-server.info> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_//Q6aNU5Ur8XXe6cIb1GZg+Y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4772cc74-5f79-422b-803c-8ba2ec119864 X-Archives-Hash: f4eea9e913e58064d3b6ad92a3f0fc10 --Sig_//Q6aNU5Ur8XXe6cIb1GZg+Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Micha?? G=C3=B3rny schrieb: >=20 > > Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically? >=20 > I guess, he means keeping udev in / ? Because adding 80 KiB of initramfs hurts so much? We should then put more work just to ensure that admin doesn't have to waste 15 minutes to recompile the kernel (if necessary), create an initramfs and add it to bootloader config? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_//Q6aNU5Ur8XXe6cIb1GZg+Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk8Mh5AACgkQfXuS5UK5QB231AP+PKXPt/OKvW+NnsCscjbMhUIo uNXAuDnqHC4I4eveUO/TQoOBhtnV+lRooMX2N2DmQiETZ485AnWKAmOIgAAqsPlS 98+W/ZahmscmfUOl00BKYaYqnvYIftXQzg9Ut6O3A1WNdiu2s7osqnzWcxncs5sR hdfRn7YX4/rue3Y9jVg= =7Q/I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//Q6aNU5Ur8XXe6cIb1GZg+Y--