From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rj5at-0000Ji-R9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:56:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BBC321C11C; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.8]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E4621C0E5 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (sofia.ins.cwi.nl [192.16.196.188]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP id q068t4S6012645 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:55:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:55:04 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Message-ID: <20120106085504.GZ36411@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120104174742.11d7002d@pomiocik.lan> <20228.34930.732592.657243@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120105193024.GA8291@linux1> <20120105200844.1124e9d4@googlemail.com> <1325797329.2385.1.camel@TesterTop4> <20120105210935.48306bb9@googlemail.com> <1325798764.2385.4.camel@TesterTop4> <4F0643D8.40009@gentoo.org> <1325816141.2385.14.camel@TesterTop4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P9SDCAjI7+EA+Yxm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1325816141.2385.14.camel@TesterTop4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 9.8.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: 3c8b860d-6b4b-436a-bbcb-80e04c741010 X-Archives-Hash: ec5f068fa3ede1ecd5383b92c1338634 --P9SDCAjI7+EA+Yxm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05-01-2012 21:15:41 -0500, Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > The big reason for C vs shell scripts is that the type of people who > write them are not the same.. The type of people who write shell scripts > tend to hack together stuff until it works. The people who write C tend > to think about the problem for a long time and then write a complete > solution that tries to take into account all of the possible error > scenarios. How are we supposed to take you seriously? You don't have to make up arguments. Instead, you can just tell what is your preference without making a fool out of yourself. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --P9SDCAjI7+EA+Yxm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk8GtugACgkQX3X2B8XHTomF5ACdFpztDZ08Z2zQWIyVvSE2u5qm +wwAn2SUeRyIu4g+RX9ujjPWOgtN6sh6 =BBjo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P9SDCAjI7+EA+Yxm--