From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49261-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RirsP-0003jC-Ib
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:17:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E61B421C234;
	Thu,  5 Jan 2012 18:17:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2572A21C235
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  5 Jan 2012 18:16:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [81.219.203.13])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mgorny)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A47C01B4033;
	Thu,  5 Jan 2012 18:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:17:27 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: 1i5t5.duncan@cox.net
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr
Message-ID: <20120105191727.548da937@pomiocik.lan>
In-Reply-To: <pan.2012.01.05.17.12.26@cox.net>
References: <20120101015947.GA9914@linux1>
	<20120101085326.GA1928@gentoo.org>
	<20120102194341.3766edeb@pomiocik.lan>
	<je1ku6$3an$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20120104165112.5c24ed12@pomiocik.lan>
	<20120104155407.7c946dbc@googlemail.com>
	<1325698810.22213.16.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca>
	<20120104183007.GG30764@lisa.schiffbauer.lan>
	<20120105092616.125d76b0@pomiocik.lan>
	<20120105110849.GC20366@lisa.schiffbauer.lan>
	<1325773867.29839.5.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca>
	<pan.2012.01.05.17.12.26@cox.net>
Organization: Gentoo
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256;
 boundary="Sig_/MJeAwpLcBpAYZk+dcMDGBRI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 9f4fbf0c-58e0-4c4e-b883-abd9c1189a45
X-Archives-Hash: 7203b7c7dcda9d3323d2b8f0a3b59393

--Sig_/MJeAwpLcBpAYZk+dcMDGBRI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:12:26 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:

> But init=3D/bin/sh (or /bin/bash as I use here) DOES help in a
> surprising number of cases as long as the necessary storage and input
> drivers and filesystem modules are builtin.  And a lot of us have
> strong ideas about wanting to keep it that way, being able to use
> init=3D/bin/sh on the kernel command line itself, from grub or whatever.

[...]

> That's low level.

Looking at your definition of 'low level', it seems that OpenRC is high
level as well.

--=20
Best regards,
Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny

--Sig_/MJeAwpLcBpAYZk+dcMDGBRI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQEIAAYFAk8F6T8ACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3zWgP+KBJe5+3NruJDGH2nH/sUAvct
dVebUIDKr3H2aE/YiiOzG6nmdKNyhJEo8lj8l5xpy3zktIyyOTlIDUhXM6wAY6ov
/o2ZN/cQaQxrmG4JsYZgUyW8vqyw7t3jECz8jakD4OpOVEnzRdMicszgLv9Jl4SI
IAiXgPmGqRkwJkiCLUw=
=LmWh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/MJeAwpLcBpAYZk+dcMDGBRI--