From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49243-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RiWTm-0006Wt-Qb
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:26:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFDA421C21E;
	Wed,  4 Jan 2012 19:26:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C638721C209
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  4 Jan 2012 19:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [81.219.203.13])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mgorny)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E3BA1B4083;
	Wed,  4 Jan 2012 19:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:26:27 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: tommy@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr
Message-ID: <20120104202627.1f8c099a@pomiocik.lan>
In-Reply-To: <4F049EE3.90204@gentoo.org>
References: <4F000C32.6020602@gentoo.org>
	<1325449284.12935.21.camel@TesterTop4>
	<20120101202355.30098545@googlemail.com>
	<1325454648.12935.24.camel@TesterTop4>
	<4F016DBE.2000209@gentoo.org>
	<1325616625.7238.23.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca>
	<20120103190255.GA13817@linux1>
	<20120103191206.GP780@gentoo.org>
	<20120103200120.GB13936@linux1>
	<20120103212215.GU780@gentoo.org>
	<20120103230918.GA7247@linux1>
	<4F03A1AA.6070205@gentoo.org>
	<20120104091743.0e1cd91a@pomiocik.lan>
	<4F0440B3.4090500@gentoo.org>
	<20120104163734.07439f2b@pomiocik.lan>
	<4F049EE3.90204@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256;
 boundary="Sig_/osltjVz/72JWTiULpPszd4z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 8f5c7ea2-de3c-42a0-88d8-3c314c6ccff5
X-Archives-Hash: c578cc8035130eaa0dde4b883e734091

--Sig_/osltjVz/72JWTiULpPszd4z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:48:03 +0100
Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Defining a prefix is no "hack", it is an option you can use.
>=20
> Anyway, we both have probably enough packages with such a "hack"
> installed, but i cannot find a single file in /lib/pkgconfig, not even
> that dir does exist. Is it different on your system?

Defining a prefix is no hack. Defining a prefix would result in
existence of such a file, and installation of static libraries in /lib.

We use hacks to move shared libraries to rootfs, and then create one
more hack to not confuse the linker with different locations of static
and shared libraries.

--=20
Best regards,
Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny

--Sig_/osltjVz/72JWTiULpPszd4z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQEIAAYFAk8Ep+MACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3VVAP+N4AYSi917W7r9dwfZaH/yDJ3
KmkQPmxCJ6qKCyWt5k3Ig8XazSLM77pdjacXJw0YnDksg0Tmv0DVnINC//JsPmmu
K7J9MyIeJbrsTTFbiBRetlodq8gSs8xgVhLQDei4NvUzkRQVnYa/RTirCDwellHA
9Yjc9070+OIwmM5Nnnw=
=PWaN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/osltjVz/72JWTiULpPszd4z--