From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RiVuZ-0006qE-AV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:50:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 369F321C1BC; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB26921C097 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [81.219.203.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C9911B408A; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:50:24 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ulm@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Message-ID: <20120104195024.100993ff@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20228.34930.732592.657243@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <1325616625.7238.23.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> <20120103190255.GA13817@linux1> <20120103191206.GP780@gentoo.org> <20120103200120.GB13936@linux1> <20120103212215.GU780@gentoo.org> <20120103230918.GA7247@linux1> <4F03A1AA.6070205@gentoo.org> <20120104091743.0e1cd91a@pomiocik.lan> <4F0440B3.4090500@gentoo.org> <20120104163734.07439f2b@pomiocik.lan> <20120104163315.GV780@gentoo.org> <20120104174742.11d7002d@pomiocik.lan> <20228.34930.732592.657243@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/5pxz8XRtenrpbTwJXS3M.J+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 962b7213-c043-460f-a97d-74f076141711 X-Archives-Hash: 53ce3b339b264d5edc01b0318373d39f --Sig_/5pxz8XRtenrpbTwJXS3M.J+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:18 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > >> What mistakes? >=20 > > The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a rule of > > thumb which becomes more and more blurry over time, and hacking > > packages just to make it work. >=20 > There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation. > The FHS has a nice definition: "The contents of the root filesystem > must be adequate to boot, restore, recover, and/or repair the system." Why don't we have sshd there then? I don't really feel like repairing remote system without fallback sshd. And a compiler. If I mess up some important system component, I'd really use one. And package manager. And backup system libraries... --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/5pxz8XRtenrpbTwJXS3M.J+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk8En3IACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0uOwQAosmD6kTINrPaKOxHzKMPNZAj 4Qqyyde6L7Tn5qOwyCZ2yFqpgr0JC5vdRai14ZYY0djttsWyn0Dkv167sUsDQvZD 0/bo5U1Gk/wVVE6jM5xOEjFI+ANcXJ9k8iWhgN6hjIMN5TrhNBaGAOrAsbdpshAQ PwFKQcPf88gbeE+UJJc= =o/09 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5pxz8XRtenrpbTwJXS3M.J+--