From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RiA57-0006ZM-Nu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:31:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4437D21C22B; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A314F21C223 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([172.17.2.83] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RiA4B-0007PB-GR for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:30:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:30:34 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Message-ID: <20120103193034.GR780@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120101015947.GA9914@linux1> <20120103095157.GC1961@waltdnes.org> <20120103151035.GA13017@linux1> <4F032F62.9050800@gentoo.org> <20120103183608.GB13702@linux1> <1325618362.20627.5.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KhwS7k2GgtcVxTLK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1325618362.20627.5.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.2.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 930ed21b-c668-439e-9492-310fd137fb1b X-Archives-Hash: a4cf417de353e1f426565a1136b86537 --KhwS7k2GgtcVxTLK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03-01-2012 14:19:22 -0500, Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 12:36 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:40:02AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > Side note - if /lib is getting moved, does that mean /lib/modules is= =20 > > > moving to /usr/lib/modules too? So kernel modules are no longer on r= oot? > > =20 > > This is an interesting question. I haven't heard one way or the other > > what is happening with /lib/modules. >=20 > I doubt the kernel will move its install location, they're a very > conservative bunch. But I heard that kmod will start looking for modules > in /usr/lib/modules ... Seems they just made it a configure argument though [1]. [1] http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/kmod.git/commit/?id=3Da308abec371364= eec8344681cfe1fb50d624e43e --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --KhwS7k2GgtcVxTLK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk8DV1oACgkQX3X2B8XHTongqwCeM0BpwWUy5j07f1B55OlkiRMo VjoAn0H06SOFwcLhvsyZVg79e4WDc3+d =ui0m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KhwS7k2GgtcVxTLK--