From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhme5-0006cb-5h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:30:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B6C221C368; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 18:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BAB21C363 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 18:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [81.219.203.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 351601B4009; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 18:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 19:30:26 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: aballier@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr Message-ID: <20120102193026.0ed5bd26@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120102145439.65ee9f7d@gentoo.org> References: <20120101015947.GA9914@linux1> <20120101001629.51c8108a@gentoo.org> <20120102145439.65ee9f7d@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/7jXx44.s1v0Ew/nJBB7WP.3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 2fa51845-0d3d-4e7d-ad1e-c1fe5aa6e43f X-Archives-Hash: 0061f67ae5cc8f9aa8409572ee5cd31d --Sig_/7jXx44.s1v0Ew/nJBB7WP.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:54:39 -0300 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 00:16:29 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:59:47 -0600 > > William Hubbs wrote: > >=20 > > > Udev, kmod (which is a replacement for module-init-tools which > > > will be needed by >=3Dudev-176), systemd, and soon others, are > > > advocating a major change to the locations where binaries and > > > libraries are stored on linux systems. > > >=20 > > > The goal is to deprecate /bin, /lib, /sbin and /usr/sbin. My > > > understanding is that they want to move software that is installed > > > in /bin, /sbin and /usr/sbin to /usr/bin. Also, they want to move > > > everything from /lib to /usr/lib. > >=20 > > I coulda swore April was another four months away... >=20 > no, in April they will declare the zillions of #!/bin/sh scripts > broken because they rely on a so old unix standard :=3D) Yes, we should migrate to #!/usr/bin/env sh :P. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/7jXx44.s1v0Ew/nJBB7WP.3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk8B98YACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1WwwP/SETWfFTdPhNVq3kyDJbsScJz TUCw7wB8dydeGvHRy0gCg7UvDxAeDcF1c/eRwDWvUIEWSda4zXktdJuPLvyZetZC IUl33Zacjl6dD4PoI/kYH4zSiBsEW+P4HEZ0NgNeHp9hSWA5DAZM9p6+FAdBQWKR VgH5l5pU71d7pq3VlRM= =iByn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7jXx44.s1v0Ew/nJBB7WP.3--