From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfaqj-00048y-19 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:30:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE72521C0DA; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D6021C079 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so11827871eek.40 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:29:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=OKwTqSjrMhuZ5w9nA2XX/DzmRYT82pHdi7R+/bYgNm4=; b=uTe4HOsRJvHg7apWc/FVJ5lFzCKyoFPUSjJA4wdSqNeJAUpIX4bYC/7jBK4lqpSqIQ WWQzXVeQlP2pJYq/mXHrPXPlIe8A+NAmjDQk7ArK5KVvRPrB8QP6vnHtg2Ul3Mcne3wU UcpDy834hIsKQIr7Y8RITGQ/WMlm4qLc+JoeI= Received: by 10.14.127.76 with SMTP id c52mr11769806eei.102.1325006956335; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:29:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lebrodyl.localnet (89-78-60-134.dynamic.chello.pl. [89.78.60.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a60sm109122504eeb.4.2011.12.27.09.29.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:29:14 -0800 (PST) From: Maciej Mrozowski To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:29:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.6-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201112210244.03517.reavertm@gmail.com> <201112202240.10262.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201112202240.10262.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8084907.ReqHabLUt2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112271829.09800.reavertm@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 78da7298-73fe-489e-881c-11358cd1fdd8 X-Archives-Hash: 6fc5f9adf46c0cc1fa255f9a19079413 --nextPart8084907.ReqHabLUt2 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 21 of December 2011 04:40:09 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 20 December 2011 20:44:03 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > I still think we should even make PN an unique identifier in order to be > > able to purge categories... that's different story though... >=20 > a world without categories is a *lot* worse than a world with $PN free > collisions Yeah.. because? Users of other distros seem to disagree with you however. (no other package= =20 manager I know relies on fixed package categories and uses tags to describe= =20 package purpose and PN-PV to identify it). But like I said, that's different story, let's not hijack this topic. =2D-=20 regards MM --nextPart8084907.ReqHabLUt2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk76AGUACgkQFuHa/bHpVdtzlACfVRRQ68nbjd72DHajluKTCYxu HDAAn3vdMQHGt0t8/5pDGx3GB5fBvtO/ =vpX8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8084907.ReqHabLUt2--