From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RcKnE-0004G2-M5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:45:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA9D821C1DD; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF4B21C1CF for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-253-147-68.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.147.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CC671B4012; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 18:45:00 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: phajdan.jr@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Six month major project on Gentoo Message-ID: <20111218184500.32198366@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <4EEE1F46.1080000@gentoo.org> References: <4EEE1C8A.8010407@gentoo.org> <4EEE1F46.1080000@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/CQsO45PpXHjbF6zgwx+ooa7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3c60e4e3-4903-4fc5-9671-b735cb60fa0d X-Archives-Hash: 4a531c01a8a3509eabc8f57e5e0c5893 --Sig_/CQsO45PpXHjbF6zgwx+ooa7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 18:13:42 +0100 ""Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > On 12/18/11 6:02 PM, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > There are parallel computing aspects in libbash for metadata > > generation, data structures in AST building for bash and it's quite > > low level. >=20 > By the way, I've always wondered why libbash is separate from the > "upstream" bash. >=20 > Have you considered contributing to the upstream bash to convert the > shell itself to a more library-oriented design (somewhat similar to > LLVM), so that you have a guarantee that the lib and the shell stay > in sync? I don't think upstream bash would be interested in converting bash into C++. I wouldn't be interested in running such a bash, for instance. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/CQsO45PpXHjbF6zgwx+ooa7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk7uJqEACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0YQwQApxXzvr1FMOHNU+/XH1ibZXZT AO9m6GvsK53U/aULiuAkXHIbWWysQ3zUIZ3kIGEDaDPaMZUt92g92SmF6QWOpVWh iVX0Hbgh7eX7xFQMhRoh23OgxEFYXSqzqtjYch04J1MyDbMu45qdAguSu626901l Mz1GTbJQipEFUr58EPQ= =qge7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/CQsO45PpXHjbF6zgwx+ooa7--