On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 18:13:42 +0100 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > On 12/18/11 6:02 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > > There are parallel computing aspects in libbash for metadata > > generation, data structures in AST building for bash and it's quite > > low level. > > By the way, I've always wondered why libbash is separate from the > "upstream" bash. > > Have you considered contributing to the upstream bash to convert the > shell itself to a more library-oriented design (somewhat similar to > LLVM), so that you have a guarantee that the lib and the shell stay > in sync? I don't think upstream bash would be interested in converting bash into C++. I wouldn't be interested in running such a bash, for instance. -- Best regards, Michał Górny