From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RZSvz-0001wy-P6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:50:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E244A21C108; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4133E21C0B7 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852E41B400C for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:49:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:49:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-atsc; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <201112101337.32789.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1548337.YZCzPpIq39"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112101449.15131.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: d1d452a9-be84-4261-9e50-bcf543cbee5a X-Archives-Hash: a969583a46006cbec2db2ca5a93b0c80 --nextPart1548337.YZCzPpIq39 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 10 December 2011 14:36:25 Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrot= e: > > On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: > >> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: > >> > - x32 is the default ABI > >>=20 > >> Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB barrier in the > >> toolchain (e.g. Firefox LTO build), wouldn't it make sense to > >> build gcc, binutils, et.al. as 64-bit LSB executables? > >=20 > > no >=20 > On a completely random note, can you even build chromium with a 32-bit > linker? I vaguely recall it requiring more than 4gb of ram to link ;p the ebuild has x86 KEYWORDS, so presumably it works =2Dmike --nextPart1548337.YZCzPpIq39 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJO47e7AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBVEgQANRd/LLt7h4Zulptcq2xuR4t fvUfb9Mth+Ih4zBlsko7MN7ZcNQIrotcezapTj1Duc/iHS42awitkZqEbTMq+1zN MOnFRNzbZn9aLX1XW1fuRsNPg+ljrrAmpyp/JCKIPXkyZSumSVazDD3685wX7XXu 5XOdQo4q/GstcL/JIr1f/7nYZPk6xU3Ak4DR887OWw1e/S3u6IxTa8P69do4AuKl 3RpjXqTA3+0D5oJr3t4kC14zycWkH135JzUwZcQfwP2tzA14mH/kig5IRUFsNN+n YFDywkspRm9XEH7C0IxCCk747nlQjVXD6ZhccEMIPBSnPUuKM92bD4oPQj1FmTyc CjO8lxjyE+DbqgPMzjU5SqYW4xSEvQmr407k5ckN23XBNPWjipT9mojwbxbXLnfS FRZer4HX3yvIEDbTHgYzlEgrGWciR4sLFQ6XUleRyvc59ozw/R+Eutdu1EVioIsT cpNAyM15HgL7D+Pk0xccgYCWwCgxPYkM0b5GLWb6YHnf668dFMrIAOtN+VE+CdDb Xoy/BpxPnCXSvpf0cD9a8aoyMFONCGX1WkO/o5EhVlRYcIN1zTajGQ9nbV1ufxw2 /Yu8WX+Qv4veDzW4fl1yAvvw63SM6NYkPnoYZ/bCyIn5SsE8GxyqxKTx2l4kaVf4 ajKrn76/otUHMyr/jdxf =wMfV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1548337.YZCzPpIq39--