From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RYPhf-0004BD-1H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:11:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D061221C224; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25CE21C21A for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F5D1B4038 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:09:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bleeding edge hardened-sources: move PaX markings from ELF to Extended Attributes Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:10:01 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-atsc; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4ED7A685.40108@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1866099.ouRYFs6bcY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112071710.01696.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 549a06c5-a871-4acd-91ce-ac083434e93f X-Archives-Hash: 86bf2309a331eef50a43254e097b4f12 --nextPart1866099.ouRYFs6bcY Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 02 December 2011 00:16:43 Duncan wrote: > Longer: Does reiserfs (v3) support xattrs and thus, presumably caps and > XT_PAX? Kernel reiserfs options suggest yes, but everything I've read > elsewhere (including gentoo-dev caps project discussions) seems to > indicate no. Is the "no" simply outdated, since reiserfs xattrs support > was added relatively late in the game, or is it still correct and I have > the purpose of those kernel options all wrong, or ??? i found reiserfs useful in the ext2/ext3 days, but now i find it completely= =20 irrelevant with ext4 > If both reiserfs and tmpfs (my $PORTAGE_TMPDIR) support xattrs, both caps= =20 > and XT_PAX should be good to go, correct? my understanding of libattr/libacl is that the userland interface is FS=20 independent. once the FS supports xattrs (if the kernel says it does, i'd= =20 believe that), then that should be all you need. while i've never tested xattrs on reiserfs (as alluded earlier, i've droppe= d=20 all my reiserfs usage in favor of ext4), but i know tmpfs works (once you'v= e=20 enabled it in the kernel). =2Dmike --nextPart1866099.ouRYFs6bcY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJO3+Q5AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBRFwP/1C6EU+onSPxbPpEgdhrKSFR KMwHCz2E255dS4hINt32n90We2L676PE1qfoCk7vkFFQ1THxXXH+eGi+Sf6YtH3o gDN1wtNfzpfJgKBT90Zu2NID7Zk+J/vI3zVQ7Gg3MEWvAJrdcHBRDUlHX/nYgtTG AnkjNkAiFMUh89H/31cBc4cMeh0DyMstujdrhw0w6KGdk7w1WsFjBJ2Brh3sDn7h PEDecs4B68m/TCp5Qvve5xuZilZCExgSi5lBFi4Gud8dAnCkfoBuxhZbRU0u3MSi 6AJzIZc3a0stTGmaT35C1+880up+frah84NtPZou1lOPWA7nJCzENBESqZA+urCr mQwfmvxz5E1jvFn02sNuGUX52EjuF4IAKe6pREYBUdU156Ip4y/lk3BZxtMXhoRm Oh128zQimPiLGNchxC1Dq9SfrF7RoR/iC5Kn3u6g5W5jcdJOlxu1EXYQ/vm+eWkO 6YmJvjXHIrANdNqGX55mi4CNfLMRh+oiuMEdDmwIlkst0VO+6mtYagsxk8ACIomR nhoQbxLc/SI3za2Us0oPtKdn0BulXqdakWKlZ0aSvFO8XCoy29vK/M/5MvNoqyWT NZpwmNGmvMq8AbPOS6SBOclgq1+tEldIqMd25YPEghOVlmHLNCXMsm4TW5aManPZ zHCu93ApvSuczriMO1kx =7LtZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1866099.ouRYFs6bcY--