From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RWcCP-0006d9-0f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:07:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AEB321C0C1 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FC521C039 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37F91B4002 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:57:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] filter-mfpmath: has Gentoo out grown it ? Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:57:13 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5601326.TzYRq0P10T"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112021757.14135.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 69beefad-a0c2-44a3-b196-2680f8b1a02f X-Archives-Hash: 0e20f26058b67aa3cbf123022d5a506a --nextPart5601326.TzYRq0P10T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i'd like to think Gentoo has grown up now to the point where we don't bothe= r=20 with trivial ricer behavior. to that end, i'd like to EOL `filter-mfpmath`. my main beef with filtering -mfpmath is that we use this only when someone= =20 actually notices and reports misbehavior with the package in question, the= =20 behavior can fluctuate between gcc versions, and it's questionable whether = the=20 flag makes a significant difference in performance. considering this is x8= 6- only, and our main user base is amd64 based, it doesn't see nearly the amou= nt=20 of attention that it did in the past. i'd prefer we leave this flag to the= =20 respective upstream packages to validate when it should be used (i.e. the=20 mplayer's and ffmpeg's and such in the world). Ryan did a check and it seems we've got all of 5 packages (and one eclass)= =20 using this. so i say it's time to scrub the tree, punt the func, and then= =20 punt people who attempt to report bugs when building their whole system wit= h - mfpmath and see misbehavior. =2Dmike --nextPart5601326.TzYRq0P10T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJO2VfKAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBAfIP/ji2XAknR/5Odkm5mBWp/L97 rPEkIhkko6TTHziBaoSzVVIDkY3tUKO3fOSVVDhy4L6cGehPgJbrSOq//c6NdquE 56PM2T7bNd6ITlktT0eZkx5rNxQJ6pq8sBcDbrXPOz9rp6ICuiu9m5GBkELX55nU poASMn6D3qwuXtecEI0zVD0xlDgD+kyCHUBsDclPukWCljmP9bSvdbnVNRdDCObY fQ7HHNS8uHcQ5KrHWRK3gn1AbQMt88KO6n6K1iCAhx08IIJM1izrya0Gg88pNlJq RaI8+6IqgCKkEy9+rnE3t0VKG8FQTZdlUDaZkoBUOTtwYMoYn9/mqreiMqv7Zozv 85yQwnvnrDQH/5w3B7+P91po/A0yCIEVavqWaFPzYvF4aef2Riyz38LjXJRWiO+f TUifuCGdN90mGz9XIJW2iHawqk/JIasRS7TVdWPt8LXMaAKYeCTl3YYCLfUkd1HH CtWMf9jrTiweM4cZwRfWJnKSjdyWxuuGf4VwblbkW+LKKmfIj76J+2XrSTctEG0c TY1XSzuLJ1dYXaDjh2syX5g2FgKZWM8y7lCnFk1rCM5kyZXxQiaJ9qsaXDwrGN3Y nPRe4ymPVckgYomNd60ReC/hYo+N+6UD6xcRRhJOvJR+959ji3XtpH0MmZnzcLYl ju/z7QaNuQd2UfXvc7ne =57sW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5601326.TzYRq0P10T--