From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ2kx-0002el-6E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:03:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC38321C132; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6E721C04C for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F891B4009 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:03:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] conversion of USE=nocxx to USE=cxx Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:03:04 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201111131342.43558.vapier@gentoo.org> <201111132337.39591.vapier@gentoo.org> <4EC16531.3010302@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC16531.3010302@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1419852.lupAQo2Cns"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111141503.04898.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 416d1c99-1849-4cb4-a1ef-bda0fa44559d X-Archives-Hash: 2dba31067a90ae5c26fe2504fa4d5a8a --nextPart1419852.lupAQo2Cns Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 14 November 2011 14:00:01 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 11/13/2011 11:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 13 November 2011 16:42:39 Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> If I understand you correctly, you are just going to add a "cxx" use > >> flag to gcc for some transitional period? If so, I can simply switch it > >> at some point after you add the new flag? > >=20 > > transition period: > > http://sources.gentoo.org/www-client/google-chrome/google-chrome-17.0.9= 32 > > .0_alpha108826.ebuild?r1=3D1.1&r2=3D1.2 > >=20 > > eventually you can drop the [-nocxx] dep, but it'll prob be a while. >=20 > Why do I need the [-nocxx] dep at this point? Everybody is going to end > up rebuilding gcc with the new use flag anyway. some people might, but not everyone. if we remove the [-nocxx], and someon= e=20 where to run `emerge google-chrome -u`, portage would fail with dependency= =20 errors. i'd leave the dep in there for a while until most people have=20 upgraded naturally. perhaps after the next gcc stabilization. =2Dmike --nextPart1419852.lupAQo2Cns Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOwXP4AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBgbsP+wTzzaVQiws0yeU+a56FomJU dBbKB5YeeepueZnf2TwYsPt5JMG0qpU71SIdcIQXDHdkbwqLy8LCjVcT5knZASrr stuDEXv8xpmyqXSSq178dHgYuyC4rntCzjJXKiNr9BjGIU/p0fugU91x1np+o3nj +9+m5VU/ckbw/Mxcvadhl2Wgkxgp8QYtahyCPdXOAdZEHeRxMy6hJqqE4TT+BChj aEfyx5nTlqIJlF7wEyZk1zT67iipeREl4NYpKcYsjhg/bvDK3QpZeT0YbGMr+oi3 X2RpTFHoO14/iDaxdOCTmmpMPpEPEMXvWsBuQ4Wmk8INOGGRI5P89lBO7G23IdA4 VZnygxoRZofYkKQgoP8Sx7BN+Xaf3Ki5EdxzhJ1tTcPsbqoDoKb6qyXQNe8Bk0q9 0kRVV49AIHJKlSyfA9WMBB7UZo/IbN9Eg/x+5l9ycr5k6wISVjIl343pIXHdbguX ciNs9aErD6DYNzANyUl/D3lZGiFCztTRBhV/Kx/OP+YMBsyzOxteD5h/nMzkKxNl 9T99l87hAKg6zryh6ESYgU0eITn0/3XObOguZBdHK6bp8ntyUYMlS47f/yoXxKkc vZCKQOS08/bKdwYglIwW+do1aXe3SWpnGse3NDMQ1p4vFS0F4Bl45NrpVCoMdNZP LkEl5Dye5M8bO0dPrjH6 =ecog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1419852.lupAQo2Cns--