From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ROzKp-0005tl-Nv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:12:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 740D621C131; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2645C21C0BC for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnv2 with SMTP id v2so5794723ggn.40 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:11:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=3GdpUZmfS1xyo3G49bh+Z44PaUOjYMLyiWD7sg4udh4=; b=poBrCpFfItkL2fvZWNkkSllDW26wW+QvXc60av7488bhSz4jUarY2CSgj00Z6/JKff Ti1rywprQzPVnPHF94gbEnlgQdzkP2M83Ynx6x4kfjsCSzCwxHFt1mfOp4zHyImwcR6K sxxhuJOQ8eaNjbWrX7FT9XeiEprUI2OAKRLRg= Received: by 10.101.4.7 with SMTP id g7mr6459308ani.32.1321049489101; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:11:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 ([76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u19sm37453230ank.11.2011.11.11.14.11.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:11:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:11:23 -0600 Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:11:23 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc: use iproute2 for all network handling in linux Message-ID: <20111111221123.GA32082@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20111111215344.GA31226@linux1> <4EBD9B47.6030008@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EBD9B47.6030008@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 0df95ef7-4230-41fb-b28f-51a7051bbcd6 X-Archives-Hash: e7dcc89c4129b2ad71fd9c77990e1ce9 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:01:43PM +0100, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy= =E1=BB=85n wrote: > William Hubbs schrieb: > > I realize there would be a trade-off if I stop supporting linux's > > ifconfig and route in openrc, but how much of a trade-off? Would the > > benefits of iproute2 outweigh the down side of not supporting ifconfig > > and route on linux? > >=20 > > What does everyone think? >=20 > +1 > Do you need iproute2 at all? I think you could fall back to busybox if > iproute2 is not installed. =20 I haven't looked at busybox that much yet, but I know that ip is part of it, so that may be a possibility. > While you are at it, please also switch from wireless-tools to iw :) > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261655 Yeah I know about that bug. :-) I want to get 0.9.5 out the door and make that a stable candidate, then after that, I will look into both of these. William --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk69nYsACgkQblQW9DDEZTgQ/QCgoZrvsDkvcdwnfKqBDrwGcobI J+QAoKLbI7IQtZt6eazR3rbtp/7cm17Q =vftp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--