From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ROsZF-0006B6-0R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:58:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4799921C095; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DCB21C03A for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [83.238.242.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A84F91B4003; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:58:10 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: jer@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stop altering of current release ebuilds and propagate the changes slowly Message-ID: <20111111155810.5ed706f1@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111111154407.5744d2ac@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <20111111094529.69e12b2d@pomiocik.lan> <20111111154407.5744d2ac@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/dJHD=pZK.ZKb=fzXgjZjF0w"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 24253832-253a-4bd6-a557-4965277f0095 X-Archives-Hash: ed76eb9aeb043f77356764f39471471b --Sig_/dJHD=pZK.ZKb=fzXgjZjF0w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:44:07 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:45:29 +0100 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > Maybe you could consider some of the releases major and other minor, > > and just keep a mask for those minor. Much like we did with Opera > > some time ago. >=20 > I have no idea what you mean. It didn't look like that when I was > doing it :) I simply mean that weekly builds were masked. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/dJHD=pZK.ZKb=fzXgjZjF0w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk69OAcACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3z4gP+IWM+qdEWwDmZGtFmtys+yvzV CN05F+n3f8CX7dyzRf6Ge9UXMcsuDeAwDFNZiXl9SMGcA3cellt754dFE+V8hhfm f43uuGLjMQhLizBj47D4Ap/dgU/EbgW1f583oDoOINk4Ey6aCkWT2MU8t9CVoEyl 9JoAnMChQJi+cYTd7KQ= =WF9F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dJHD=pZK.ZKb=fzXgjZjF0w--