From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ROtgT-00015T-Ic for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:10:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7439421C05B; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57BF21C022 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0323C1B4039 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: have portage be quiet by default Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:09:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4EB4FA98.3080201@gentoo.org> <4EBD4457.4020208@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4EBD4457.4020208@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3349557.7UX4F24pbN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111111109.46822.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4bb22420-2007-4475-a9b1-25485776f229 X-Archives-Hash: 4d118badb10b02d5d2a86125e303b812 --nextPart3349557.7UX4F24pbN Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 11 November 2011 10:50:47 Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/10/2011 10:59 PM, Duncan wrote: > > But please do at least einfo the change, and what to do to get back to > > non-quiet by default if desired. Someone mentioned a news item. I'm n= ot > > sure it warrants that, but certainly an einfo, and if a news item will > > prevent needless bugs and is thought to be worth the required > > bureaucracy, I've no problem with it. >=20 > Yeah, I think a new item is a bit too much. I'll mention it in the > ebuild ChangeLog, the RELEASE-NOTES, and I'll also trigger an elog > message when upgrading from earlier versions. a note to dev-announce might be a good compromise. i think a news item too= =20 heavy as well ... =2Dmike --nextPart3349557.7UX4F24pbN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOvUjKAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBfO4P/3BhW949BhtvWeRXBsQFu+c+ 6wVxFGdBAAUD7E6Oe/aBJqx41n5E78Nv/2dnH151s+AGpIlOeFS4RZthIzvzWXVm /7yd9mdKj6Ma4b5txfA8R+JwmJ6JtGU7XxrJQ+fajnJftM65XYTbsQ6SDNYe9oh0 xBrao5I5Pe7J80uAktCNYZ47fF4d/QiK23+SqGUrs1YuO7grE5NWEPBTM8x9kqeE FT3/7VSU+AJOT5HE3VSbCg/pei+Q9VakFCJEubK6SDrf3mcyP0rxFUhAE54g49z/ fQwtjXBbMkEtdDftjZ50jhB0WRnHjNWkRHFxTM8hsTvP2Sj+IUYVHnkjhjc2B2m+ umdvnJBxpdjadOhMyJf0sy3zCYFP4+eSsl5rryI366oQOHDvDcBQKPOkl0oHfj/d HDKf1pTk18xZLq+DG6u6veW/6VqYSk5NcadzKd6FcP5ppQsDm5zUt3SAjSe2abI5 BtvCPagua3TBbvBJAa9Z5kzwaG4kVEJzY7M82VREO1rcWXjXnvu8p3nXZaKw/XHb QebkECNew2M7UMZlljr7TJlAmMbKIxnbhYHod/0v/BuDiX32yX4gqUsJ/QXQROoA 0GhPwzLvl2q3BPwQ3y1i3kvjnQTNG+2fsIdQIe6WJx8jM5JnfSpIG7BEbh/2h9Ng juoYx3I40YR9iFGChtBR =HDeu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3349557.7UX4F24pbN--