From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RM6g3-0007jt-BF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:26:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E317121C0B6; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 23:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BB421C046 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 23:25:45 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7471ELeN8= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-166-116.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.166.116]) by smtp.strato.de (cohen mo9) (RZmta 26.10 AUTH) with ESMTPA id m072afnA3KVCZe for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:25:34 +0100 (MET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog in eclass dir (was: Old changelogs / eclass dir) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:25:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <201110261946.35058.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <201111030111.51863.dilfridge@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201111030111.51863.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1743625.bLfbDVvZ6j"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111040025.40406.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 81ed9415-4869-45f1-afdc-a4c6ec1bbbb2 X-Archives-Hash: eb7bc366d9648986e58694942614fc4f --nextPart1743625.bLfbDVvZ6j Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory? > > In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical > > reasons... Should we still start one? >=20 > as there was only positive feedback to this suggestion, I'll create a > ChangeLog file in the eclass directory during the next days. (Last chance > to protest!) And done. :) huettel@pinacolada ~/Gentoo/gentoo-x86/eclass $ cvs commit /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/ChangeLog,v <-- ChangeLog initial revision: 1.1 huettel@pinacolada ~/Gentoo/gentoo-x86/eclass $=20 =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart1743625.bLfbDVvZ6j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6zIvQACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWog3QCffIKZ1gBcLpofAH+91IMSUvER Hp8An08IhLa7DxVFlR9Turoafh8d73wH =bsCH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1743625.bLfbDVvZ6j--