From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ6gK-0006iS-DC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:50:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC37A21C08E; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EDC21C047; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [87.204.190.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E5AC1B401F; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:49:27 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: grobian@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 Message-ID: <20111026184927.255ed3bb@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111026163724.GB843@gentoo.org> References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan> <20111026163724.GB843@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/UAyB700NRkZ9jz9t5pCEtra"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0b6eead12d5b67cdded564a924ac940b --Sig_/UAyB700NRkZ9jz9t5pCEtra Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:37:24 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 26-10-2011 18:35:51 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +0200 > > Fabian Groffen wrote: > >=20 > > > In less than two weeks, the council will meet again. This is the > > > time to raise and prepare items that the council should put on > > > the agenda to vote on. > >=20 > > As an extension of ChangeLog topic, I'd like to suggest to require > > developers to commit packages with matching (same) ChangeLog entries > > and commit messages. >=20 > Ok, what's your rationale behind that? 1) easier migration to autogenerated ChangeLogs if we want that at some point, 2) better availability of the information (right now, looking up changes sometimes involves checking both CVS log and ChangeLog message to see what actually happened), 3) one step towards preventing useless ChangeLog entries. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/UAyB700NRkZ9jz9t5pCEtra Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk6oOhgACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1HjgP/aQA6iLmwAim5OUz24MhG1bGR yp9aaZ8FnzT+Pp8HT5LgFFQAvbtQsTyz2sS8D/P6JW3b16te5IAoRVbhtptzxzAC DEtHsVmrZy8oBYusTZsbfAn7W3z7zP1mceosiJsogldK3Uhou8GIk5PmTYIjiegz DmG8pDonqCEBpBxSA+0= =/9Cw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/UAyB700NRkZ9jz9t5pCEtra--