From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving more hardening features to default?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:39:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111020233920.7e022c4f@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4E9FFAAB.2060802@gentoo.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1022 bytes --]
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:40:43 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@gentoo.org> wrote:
> USE=hardened refers to only toolchain hardening. The problems there are
> mostly packages which break with PIE because they (ab)use assembly.
> Things like virtualbox and some codecs. This can become a thorny mess.
>
> It would probably be nearly painless to bring in -D_FORTIFY_SOURCES=2
> and ssp into mainstream though. Packages which break because of either
> of those two features are broken and should be fixed anyhow.
If any of these features (other than -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE) relies on spec rule
handling of preprocessor flags then I'd like you to try reimplementing them
another way. I'm going to hack 4.6 to work properly but I expect it to break
again with 4.7.
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-20 8:47 [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-10-20 10:40 ` Anthony G. Basile
2011-10-20 10:46 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2011-10-20 12:41 ` Rich Freeman
2011-10-20 12:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-20 14:36 ` Anthony G. Basile
2011-10-20 16:47 ` Rich Freeman
2011-10-20 17:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-20 20:51 ` Magnus Granberg
2011-10-23 3:56 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J Long
2011-10-25 10:10 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-10-25 16:12 ` Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
2011-10-27 1:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J Long
2011-10-20 11:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego Elio Pettenò
2011-10-20 12:49 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-21 5:39 ` Ryan Hill [this message]
2011-10-20 12:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2011-10-21 3:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-10-21 12:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-21 15:25 ` Duncan
2011-10-21 16:37 ` Magnus Granberg
2011-10-25 14:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kacper Kowalik
2011-10-25 14:46 ` Patrick Lauer
2011-10-25 15:11 ` Rich Freeman
2011-10-25 15:38 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111020233920.7e022c4f@gentoo.org \
--to=dirtyepic@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox