From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RGvOX-0004BW-GB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:23:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BB0DE0767; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306B0E05DD for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793371B4006 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:22:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] huse: new helper for low level eclass writers Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:22:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-rc4; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201110191405.51308.vapier@gentoo.org> <201110200126.57686.vapier@gentoo.org> <20111020155844.GB23859@comet.mayo.edu> In-Reply-To: <20111020155844.GB23859@comet.mayo.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1688962.0Ltj1SiBoY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110201222.25671.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 67ad6fbac7f6d9ac6d5eddb6a006d762 --nextPart1688962.0Ltj1SiBoY Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 20 October 2011 11:58:44 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 01:26 Thu 20 Oct , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 October 2011 15:40:50 Brian Harring wrote: > > > Name's a bit off though considering if the host was amd64, `huse amd6= 4` > > > would return 1 since it's not in IUSE. > >=20 > > good point. how about "iuse_use" ? or "use_iuse" ? >=20 > use_in_iuse ? to me, that sounds like "is the use flag in iuse". but maybe i'm over thin= king=20 things. =2Dmike --nextPart1688962.0Ltj1SiBoY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOoErBAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBLFAQAJuw5hW4ZRFCgRX5u490x+XS l7KerN++cW/hGCLPBhg7nnp0qleCLE200I9vifjNWxlILrrnbFiRTEFdh3zaJCdy O4JQbmifIRw+wr82LPxrslZGY7Qd9sgieDuwtqDtSI6gjTe1BL7GajwuhrwRK84n rrSMOMpxuNXtM/aCcisWJO90h6NC0zBZaocXFYVkHY9tIyVPG7EquHksT/xo6Y+w K4mqoAzSTyj9IFAKebNemNHHmETsneqjhOZe1Jz8WALwPXRVJGE+JalUOxi85vLP 8LCGlBpgKK4Sxb7QxvKa9IDKsqX0o+CJIDF/b3gQJWkCiCLFbwS5M9tAmUuF6hDZ wA83SIW5J05xX8kVsg77tSqDBF7x6KFV8Fnah5bMVEaw2pNF6Qpk3UTFONdoO86b MHORNtGuxejrMFkn5WpYsqtB3u04IHADbtD/Af7bJDAH/4ifRKf/TMdeYJGuJnL+ fuJ5DSNuIvZer6fm46tMfzZXXTzlZehmoBJpRhQFBrKB9eAVHScLpTPRjBw24qx5 N2M/ajn8Y3K9EWjUSmTdfEyUdSm/wyJpsPTpatxf9mkmJMgPm0Cy07vdrUiuYpk0 RQ2BE8BAr0roddkOoOyqn+ykqt4KY0V4fKq2W3iwn8SraXtEoOUo61aB75QCCu3n vyyAk0qhKP4rNUNHOZvo =b1b5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1688962.0Ltj1SiBoY--