From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RFONQ-0008Kz-4m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:55:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A580021C061; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850FC21C023 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bullet.local (p5DD23132.dip.t-dialin.net [93.210.49.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tove) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D131A1B4012 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bullet.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8D0A40052; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:54:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:54:38 +0200 From: Torsten Veller To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla proxy-maintainer template Message-ID: <20111016124716.TAcb2217.tv@veller.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20111016095818.368D22004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20111016103259.GA16970@veller.net> <4E9AB344.2000609@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E9AB344.2000609@gentoo.org> X-Face: ===_______=8)_=8)_______A_very_very_nice_face_______=8)_=8)_______=== Jabber-ID: tove@jabber.ccc.de X-PGP-Fingerprint: 0416 3C11 8D79 65B9 AAD0 2065 BBC7 14D1 9C67 CD96 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+46 (b01d63af6fea) (2011-07-01) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 09cb62c9925d0e2f46dd125fca163858 * Markos Chandras : > However, a comment draws more attention than a bugzilla > note. That's exactly the problem for watchers of maintainer-needed or -wanted. Every mail draws some attention. Anyway I can /dev/null those mails. Just need to create another rule. -- Regards