From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-48219-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1REncV-0000Tj-UE
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:40:40 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31EFC21C115;
	Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com (mail-pz0-f47.google.com [209.85.210.47])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B286F21C064
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:40:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pzd13 with SMTP id 13so1489125pzd.6
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=LlmiCqLpwTeCr/w9roHw9Ng+r+XAG02I9rfQ6zt0sVs=;
        b=xV/imjB2PZn74MSb4QWFr+Tct1e+mr+y+SbqQs1Po/dYXe8Rlz6lYInF+wBZY041fN
         Vh5Z8HaAc7HJw7Z9oT7Yk3zFi/x0dTfcfvqN06A4tytjrZX8Szi9qUp2slLmYcccqwkM
         sdE4vBHentnTwfuQhLwZzbn3cknVEyKHGR82M=
Received: by 10.68.5.228 with SMTP id v4mr17686434pbv.106.1318621199871;
        Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.gmail.com:587 ([2620:0:1000:fd10:224:d7ff:feae:c014])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o6sm25937178pbb.1.2011.10.14.12.39.56
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.gmail.com:587 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:39:58 -0700
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:39:58 -0700
From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>
To: "Pawe?? Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really
 annoying
Message-ID: <20111014193958.GA3465@localhost>
References: <4E8766F1.2020609@gentoo.org>
 <CAEdQ38HexzFJVfou2Q0ikQqQHd++MNaOkoPHRdiuY-X0GP0C3A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEdQ38HexzFJVfou2Q0ikQqQHd++MNaOkoPHRdiuY-X0GP0C3A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: f45cb0bb45bb94767ed31def98e940f9

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:29:19PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:16 PM, "Pawe?? Hajdan, Jr."
> <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > OK, so what are the _blocking_ reasons for no EAPI 4 support in
> > python.eclass yet?
> >
> > I understand you have some complicated patches in flight etc etc, but
> > are they _required_ for the eclass not to break with EAPI 4?
> >
> > My point is that I'd like to use pkg_pretend in packages that use
> > python.eclass and I can't (for a long time). Unless there are really
> > important reasons like breakages I think we should really make
> > python.eclass support EAPI=4.
> 
> Two weeks and no response from python@?

You probably should've cc'd them.

You emailed gentoo-dev only.
~brian