From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RE91f-0005f8-Rj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B4FE21C10D; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7851E21C0F0 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68651B401C for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:19:02 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-rc4; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20111001170259.E4D702004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4E96226D.8060807@gentoo.org> <4E9629A7.3080405@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E9629A7.3080405@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1760409.C5OmoeV3Oq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110122019.02773.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f29d7d973d70a2c855bdfe556104bbe5 --nextPart1760409.C5OmoeV3Oq Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:58:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > >>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. > >>=20 > >> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the > >> tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the > >> depgraph. > >=20 > > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. >=20 > I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scar= y. this isn't helping the conversation =2Dmike --nextPart1760409.C5OmoeV3Oq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOli52AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBAtgP/2+a081Zw4ZpJLDSTohjbEG6 ABvtumCmP7Ny50NgCx80B47uWCgJYZAyHB8V4FHeZfgODSQL8qnLXjje2UZTMyJD CgcQQO3UHnYmU70u16zbuSEycIUZKel4vrsXvvL5LTrGWT7FwnDw82E+alZWlA4V SGGmEXnFbtCzQMGxra1bN56EsV/hUXUQZqyyHF2rEDC3qPsUmGd5Gj+zATDP68Bz Wxq6HOd9TdCf7oZY5HKFlZLTWFx19xXvnNPLZJ9EY7ji5CRXj8OZB82WLHgwVYB+ eBsqz5Gi7WVRNW39RRkEGeOsoMVmylYHli2/KNwXsGMkUBMRrC6U02HvH1tPac2q XJ4RAsxF1JPHo8qw1AwYdH7/o7eCa46FLxH9dWssp+eM/26mWqKK7Q3eOxoLXGch PibYz9oBCkavU4FSw5I+dOH3rmmsHDl437fe89rn+dz075uUMut3M/bhikCidWWx CSrbGsYtFgV7cpvLY6Fjg9J6++JNi8ZpFOoDOOunZPJWxfn1ZygwGsED5WtwyG3h z2fOGOR+d+loN6XvjswiUckKJluwr5u66Nk3Qf39OQhkb2jrri8jNm7jW6m+9jBf csOzRRkQIw0KOoHU+HCjlU9NRhXutHixhD2vp5f4wmvgEyu8ba3HireOOzw1Du3R 5afEZOuI2HH5Ij4NvCK7 =8j9+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1760409.C5OmoeV3Oq--