From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RE5Ds-0005g7-Fs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:16:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8596421C0E2; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DC121C028 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D041B4004 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:15:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-rc4; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20111011164918.2103A2004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201110121551.06245.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1715088.c2QHsSpkha"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110121615.40396.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 47366ca76a598aaa4cd682080a52c15f --nextPart1715088.c2QHsSpkha Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:57:45 Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: > 2011/10/12 Mike Frysinger: > > On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:44:53 Alec Warner wrote: > >> If I want to add a patch to the list I might forget to to add the \ > >=20 > > admittedly, i hit this every once in a while, and with all the "|| die" > > being implicit, it doesn't get caught right away. fortunately latest > > portage will issue a QA warning at the end along the lines of "command > > not found: ${FILESDIR}/${P}-my-new.patch". so one can hope the > > maintainer tests their ebuilds and reviews QA output before committing >=20 > That is the reason for the patch array implemented in the base eclass > and why i want it in eapi5. i'm aware of this being in base.eclass, but personally, i've avoided that=20 thing (and will continue to do so). if it's part of the EAPI, that'd be co= ol=20 and i'd probably start using it in my ebuilds. =2Dmike --nextPart1715088.c2QHsSpkha Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOlfVsAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB+VgP/RnzD4ib8wfaJefXRgdFo0iZ DtuOW+o0eNImrbWETH8P/Cj49wct9mTsUtt9EC4BKV4RkPGb9f7BgarHn6cX6FiC tHLR2+bZMDZmuoK1V9Ka4s4r7EWWGgbjcsjH29g9y0ZaeN8+xKVm3lRYJ1TxWNpr qo90X/RfqG4ksO0Gl6ZdH7l4ION8yaeMa3m7IKEScG+YELJS2TZQ8oLQWbAKHz80 kO1KW54VjpBL+9UGoCY0icVCgKB9e5g7yu+TQ/+TZashj/agDnJEoXFsrUSHOGya hpF3nqejCFIzcPa3idRo8E24o8t15kYIlpC0QAcNkcdGnstdqo4tN7QhzGfeS8lO JPw+3QyEadI+aWGbUg5v1Lt1lxscEbJqYpMW4YFmTfR2ypvxKTWTNZSZ0a6TffY+ s+G1TWScPdsaj2RMTsVoYrl6fxuhO8GWQSla7PvX5W4w76hEPR2zwAx8/7lU+/K3 6o7Fxm1kWLJ6a7XIm9lQon8oZBHv4MIWmRBomuVcli6kbE2QqsnZLJlQDMMAlBUn cRJjcX4ly2NqfvjJmzdH/lTlKU+tLQqbtpcSVHuP3XVC5d0Zmaj0dkzprnENmqL9 +rNUnf8dAHOcT3CAqKw8SjNrx1mpWUx9+veGTgTB4Vtpvxtj/BvU3oT54kycfZ58 LFlMBJojwO27yzzZnW4r =Smr/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1715088.c2QHsSpkha--