From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RDiX9-00061Q-7I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:02:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB8E721C1AC; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDDA21C180 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:02:00 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7471ELeN8= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-166-116.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.166.116]) by smtp.strato.de (fruni mo25) (RZmta 26.10 AUTH) with ESMTPA id 203b7cn9BI6eOC for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:01:43 +0200 (MEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:01:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.7.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E900E3E.2070202@gentoo.org> <4E948991.3060306@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E948991.3060306@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1829599.fZy49yZ6KZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110112201.43457.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: be050d80613bb70690e3ee286c818606 --nextPart1829599.fZy49yZ6KZ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Dienstag 11 Oktober 2011 20:23:13 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/11/11 18:34, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Markos Chandras >=20 > > wrote: > I understand your points but given the fact that we have no active QA > team to pick up the mess whenever needed (Diego can't do eveyrything > on his own) I will keep doing what I think it is best for Gentoo. If > you or others don't like that please take this to devrel, to QA, to > the president or to master Yoda. Before you(not your in particular) do > that though, make sure you double checked that I indeed violated the > official policy. Now it's getting slightly ridiculous.=20 We don't have an active QA team anymore because some people thought it=20 detrimental that they even tried to enforce rules (which we gave ourselves,= =20 just as a reminder). Taking the resulting vacuum as a reason to just keep ignoring rules (which,= by=20 the way, every new recruit has to learn) is somehow taking the argument ful= l=20 circle. =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart1829599.fZy49yZ6KZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6UoKcACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWq8TACfdiwDdrz2Z7Uc5QIshRLw2KeW RbcAn0V9+PtP6lGGWPIbOLdwgz6SdPv3 =AKhf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1829599.fZy49yZ6KZ--