From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RDIqd-0006yz-85 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:37:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78D1F21C1D3; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2133D21C1F5 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-254-94-0.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.94.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57BFC1B400F; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:38:48 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dberkholz@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils] Use elibtoolize from libtool.eclass to fix libtool magic. Message-ID: <20111010183848.5d365ed5@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111010161049.GA4972@comet> References: <1318148506-10270-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <20111010020843.GA3070@comet> <20111010095511.05055076@pomiocik.lan> <20111010161049.GA4972@comet> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/=NyIF61ipfVfd/dJ4RFIMVU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6abccda7e445cdb3449db8c2276cabef --Sig_/=NyIF61ipfVfd/dJ4RFIMVU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:10:49 -0500 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 09:55 Mon 10 Oct , Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:08:43 -0500 > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 10:21 Sun 09 Oct , Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > > We're calling it with '--patch-only' to avoid heavy changes to=20 > > > > ebuilds. This should handle gracefully eautoreconfed packages > > > > and those not using libtool as well (in worst case, it should > > > > try to apply patches twice). > > >=20 > > > What kind of testing have you done? > >=20 > > Simple testing on a few packages of mine. If you have something > > specific in mind, please be more accurate. >=20 > It's probably better to test on other people's code, since your own > will always use eclass code in the way you imagine it being used. For > changes to popular eclasses like this, I'd go find a cross-section of > 25+ packages written by a variety of people besides yourself (or just > test all 87 in the tree). Yeah, I'm slowly testing random packages against it and haven't seen any problems yet. Would be nice, though, to be able to let tinderbox do the testing with modified eclasses. > Bonus points for those written by the most > and least experienced devs, who I'd expect to use things in more=20 > unexpected/unlikely ways. Sunrise seems a good choice here. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/=NyIF61ipfVfd/dJ4RFIMVU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk6TH5sACgkQfXuS5UK5QB26agP/dUWfzpVqjevlTVOxYB3LxRLX 1Hxk7XpU/oS2Go1L3eulaAUHno5/pYJo32n1O+lFo9rsnaC5uw951Xhu7cK71j08 ud9l7vamkwZjyiFl613YaWXpuHTX+Ta4+uq39nSEl42TVzu6YbfmP2Ifs/7UbJ5O Tqq8ogCcTFLJWpSaaNw= =fstL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=NyIF61ipfVfd/dJ4RFIMVU--