From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RD5J0-0003WP-KX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:09:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FE2621C09E; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA48D21C058 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (24-179-244-217.dhcp.roch.mn.charter.com [24.179.244.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dberkholz) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F09CD1B4009 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:08:43 -0500 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils] Use elibtoolize from libtool.eclass to fix libtool magic. Message-ID: <20111010020843.GA3070@comet> References: <1318148506-10270-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318148506-10270-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 886719ae57b0e12cd2accc30c18507e2 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10:21 Sun 09 Oct , Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > We're calling it with '--patch-only' to avoid heavy changes to ebuilds. > This should handle gracefully eautoreconfed packages and those not using > libtool as well (in worst case, it should try to apply patches twice). What kind of testing have you done? --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Council Member / Sr. Developer Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.com --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6SU6sACgkQXVaO67S1rttrNwCg/U5mogEDjknAIeYhId8xaekk 2HwAn3Pha6A3cf6hY252ixQlZssqKApz =1wZ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--