From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RCZ8B-0002DD-27 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:48:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15A2D21C091; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3534D21C039 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RCZ7a-0006aO-QM for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:47:31 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 17:47:29 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush Message-ID: <20111008154729.GO704@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <4E900E3E.2070202@gentoo.org> <4E905C48.20008@gentoo.org> <20111008151336.GN704@gentoo.org> <4E906D3B.2090200@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mlnxvmnLyWgus2CN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E906D3B.2090200@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.1.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c8bbe04642417217aebbe1641c44f1d7 --mlnxvmnLyWgus2CN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08-10-2011 18:33:15 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I question > your motives in picking this particular one. It's not like I expected > cookies for the time I've put into this porting effort, but not this > "attack" either. If you feel I'm attacking you, then I apologise. My personal feeling is that my response was very mild and not directed to you. I haven't responded to your earlier "fastened lastriting" messages on purpose. Now that Matt brought it up for this package, I just liked to point out that we have a policy, that was made for some reason, and that you violated it. I realise that it may look like I'm picking just on you. I'm not. This is the risk you run as one of the top committers of Gentoo. I think you do a lot of good work, and I hope you'll keep on doing so for a long time. You just tend to change rules as you see fit every once in a while, which is a bad thing for Gentoo. I don't like all policies either, but I stick to them (for as far as I'm aware of them), because if we all would start to ignore what we don't like, then what would be the point in having those policies at first? Again, this doesn't mean that each policy in its current form is de-facto the best thing or something like that. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --mlnxvmnLyWgus2CN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk6QcJEACgkQX3X2B8XHToncjACdG9BgjyIvLrM87uXwS6grFOfO LsgAnjXmBn11gXULc0+G2qr1JcPHnsxk =S7DB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mlnxvmnLyWgus2CN--