From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R5ZID-0005YC-7J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:33:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED9A121C3CD; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ABB21C402 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (213-238-104-87.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.104.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBBF51B4034; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:33:55 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: kumba@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr Message-ID: <20110919103355.2e124fd2@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <4E76FA06.8000409@gentoo.org> References: <1740055.XA9oyAS8HQ@eve> <4E7252A1.2000300@gentoo.org> <1336457.yNbGUQDlCr@eve> <4E7584E8.2080009@gentoo.org> <20110918144958.6dc836ce@pomiocik.lan> <4E75FFB6.3030600@gentoo.org> <4E76FA06.8000409@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/dfre.z.C8h0ZkabRJ5F0KnR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c7667f5a86ececd0eb15587f9cbe6e7b --Sig_/dfre.z.C8h0ZkabRJ5F0KnR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 04:15:02 -0400 Joshua Kinard wrote: > But if udev upstream is taking *away* choice, and making /usr > mandatory (especially if it's because some other distro has this > offbeat, utopian, =C3=BCberDesktop concept), then that's a bug and someone > needs to write a patch and send it upstream. Does the patch involve moving even more stuff to rootfs? If I'm going to see /share directory or even more /usr/share files in /lib, then I'm probably going to fork something too. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/dfre.z.C8h0ZkabRJ5F0KnR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk52/nQACgkQfXuS5UK5QB22cwQAgYYNkQrjfl0SVCtIsHGv9lRw MgOS94tICdai8T+oBRsaWgrXJaZpWJwnzDqWUSRoJSjFaRSJvSROGRI0Cx67RGDT 90jzO+kvKgtdn5C3uWUATi9HfmjY5MN2s0j/SA50T7/Ckte/+pgOwOnX6kX5BQzX zG1qQuEgzi5wjTjU7Jw= =kb7z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dfre.z.C8h0ZkabRJ5F0KnR--