From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R5GnN-0001FS-Eh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:48:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4AE821C171; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE89C21C152 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (213-238-104-87.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.104.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F3101B4027; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:49:58 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: rich0@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr Message-ID: <20110918144958.6dc836ce@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <1740055.XA9oyAS8HQ@eve> <4E7252A1.2000300@gentoo.org> <1336457.yNbGUQDlCr@eve> <4E7584E8.2080009@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/DObFjgVCFwTCPO0jXS6.2iO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 2e95e08aa42adf35a10acd90e882323b --Sig_/DObFjgVCFwTCPO0jXS6.2iO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:38:31 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > Is there something in particular that is causing alarm with systemd? > All I've seen is a package in the tree and some discussion. I'm sure > there will be requests for various packages to install some files > needed for integrations/etc. If anything is traumatic I'd be > specific in stating concerns so that the root cause can be addressed. No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks are doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files whenever necessary or use the eclass whenever upstream supplies those files. In other words, some devs just found themselves a scapegoat. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/DObFjgVCFwTCPO0jXS6.2iO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk516PcACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1EAQQAnb/THgbiAxqQFsLqAteXbOYP FBy7MrzsITljiuiQ9Q2g+KnYnPq6VvrF/uNQVZHcTMZttPINpKOyInk+UJ1hvgU5 IhlHxYAgbbhMR55DcN8WkD4NMJp9o9c4s40I7q1xRCm4G0FZcqDtO1r7I8Kdzwtu cm5SCwz/A6PHmpxuOEQ= =OCL/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DObFjgVCFwTCPO0jXS6.2iO--