From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-47707-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1R58Ma-0005H1-KJ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 03:48:17 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C91D21C11F;
	Sun, 18 Sep 2011 03:48:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4499A21C079
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 03:47:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (24-179-244-217.dhcp.roch.mn.charter.com [24.179.244.217])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: dberkholz)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DB681B401E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 03:47:37 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:47:35 -0500
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for
 September 13 council meeting
Message-ID: <20110918034735.GA4525@comet.mayo.edu>
References: <4E64C7BB.907@gentoo.org>
 <201109160122.00747.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com>
 <20110915235444.GB31364@beast>
 <201109160220.27814.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
 <4E73BA52.3000501@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E73BA52.3000501@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 59c8c04883735f0b090f6e3f0525241e


--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 14:06 Fri 16 Sep     , Zac Medico wrote:
> Bumping the EAPI of the root profiles/eapi file would be a different=20
> matter, since it applies to the whole repository. If you want to=20
> version bump that repository-level EAPI, then you need to wait until=20
> at least 6 months after supporting package managers have been=20
> available in stable.

So in your opinion, it would be fine to bump profiles/eapi to EAPI=3D4=20
now?

--=20
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Council Member / Sr. Developer
Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.com

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk51adcACgkQXVaO67S1rtvMSwCcC014qKj6cCqUJDJtRJ5tXqcs
UhEAoIw3q7ozKe22Od2AG7WahUdDfh+f
=iTqk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--