From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4erP-0002CZ-R7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:18:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B06D21C213; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA7E21C18C for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:17:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C701B4007 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:17:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:17:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-rc4; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <201109161208.41518.vapier@gentoo.org> <4E739F00.1010609@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E739F00.1010609@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5571311.kVrup0qfGi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109161617.24082.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 00f7f06a582be5cc5de0700bb22dbe98 --nextPart5571311.kVrup0qfGi Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday, September 16, 2011 15:09:52 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > > On Friday, September 16, 2011 04:28:24 Stratos Psomadakis wrote: > >> Is a x86/amd64/x32 multilib profile just going to provide toolchain > >> support for x32 binaries (like x86 in a x86/amd64 multilib profile), or > >> do we want a 'full' x32 profile, where every package is built by defau= lt > >> as x32 code? > >=20 > > this is an issue for the multilib-portage project >=20 > How is this an issue for multilib-portage? the user picks which packages to build for which ABI. x32 support has noth= ing=20 to do with building every package for every available ABI. =2Dmike --nextPart5571311.kVrup0qfGi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOc67UAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBrwwQAInN09QLNlxN2mDMI5LqFOuQ p3ABzwe27oSCQ0znDKVAG3iSROjy3+YW8Uh4Ju5Tba1Un7Qq195sozA4pqkv8MIR Hxe4K5vMdZv1J3ZKMuJerPTe5UuDOgdbkXqMMQashNHTaHJpjrW1WP8MCNpxikEs qaE/cQXrYcMSWk/pF3iDg+/DCwzV1IkRuL+jq4uy+rq6Fa7PaP1PDq6DD4P05QqX nIhOMcvkazMr39SUdXKk1VGDqlt99VxOkeFjEE7epaImobwXGnI4f+NxcnImjFPo TnlUdRM7CvmUrCOpRzfImAd5UaBfSJ+0A8iOqLQlBtcEUgz5uhNcIj15n8LEHqcf WQyca52byV+IFjqhc7ipBnpLzY0Fglt5Jin8fRsnwi4fS1Qw1GJdIdLyxuhTcIm/ 3L5tJhklqrQ5JqEnD2LhfnzDH7KinQbEMEjOVrrCXA5ZU2IJVFR6z4Ywond1KktR n+LuwWXC/R5YidjQiRdUxxKbOaUaPjmDN0/zIYjIwf886cblpH+Q+CQRxm51BSVh hZyQaqhPg03UXeIhExyASdOxQ8/X46+BSlGwTiMlkNPodDVINnfRwd2Um2dGigZv 24rUW4BHYM2acxqDCrnsSVIyvdXk0GFcw0fxj34Ot3UEk89tm09Vwo9ltkLfoaZG aHRcOzGjKIziXoaN9fnb =t6bP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5571311.kVrup0qfGi--