From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4cHD-0000A6-Fp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:32:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3824021C1EE; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DFD21C18D for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4713C1B4013 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:32:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:32:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-rc4; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <4E730189.2010207@gentoo.org> <4E7365F1.1070702@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E7365F1.1070702@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4874512.X2Af0rHY8b"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109161332.01947.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c07e30d54554b697230f8afe2a3731be --nextPart4874512.X2Af0rHY8b Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:06:25 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 09/16/11 10:58, Stratos Psomadakis wrote: > > On 09/16/2011 10:48 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>>> PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because > >>>> x86_32 x86_64 x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont have > >>>> different keywords for different mips abis (64bit and 32bit > >>>> ones) > >>>=20 > >>> that'd be nice :) > >>=20 > >> Seems even acceptable. Not sane but acceptable. People tend to > >> keyword packages both '~amd64 ~x86' testing them on amd64 only; > >> amd64 users tend to get sad when someone keyworded a package > >> '~x86' only. > >>=20 > >> On the other hand, it'd be good to have ABI sub-keywords then. > >> Something like 'x86:x86 -*' if a package is actually x86-only. > >=20 > > I guess there are only a few cases where a package should be > > keyworded for eg x86, but not for amd64, so these few cases can be > > handled by p.masks, right? > >=20 > > So, we can have a single x86 keyword, and a single x86 'parent' > > profile, and subprofiles for x86(or x86_32), amd64, and x32. > >=20 > > I guess it's not that simple, but I think that's how the mips > > profiles work? >=20 > I am a bit confused by your proposal. Do you suggest to drop 'amd64' > and use x86(parent)/amd64(subprofile)(for x86_64) instead? that would be ideal, and drop "amd64" in the process: x86/x86_64/ =2Dmike --nextPart4874512.X2Af0rHY8b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOc4gRAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBE7EP/3mMhpyK36lF9QSupW5JuRnO 8FywWgkaKzWGViebyziQxsESxm7ddgoiBfPLr6/Mcwokman283yZuAH2Whd/wf9Q hWiQvjWn/IF46C32g6JZ10FOL7hB5RcfeCQ2XDn028AsQW+gJI9WwKNwIPhA7hBb UeiJM2197AhEVULsxJck2sH7FqXrFOrVpB49iHXdLZBvw5QCyLZAOeu6aN9+Vc0b GdGVKjsXMsACytl4z7xqaFj3++plpGMFzQ0NQg7eVpuocFVv/3TXa6Nmt+ygHqzT nshFk2JZtSP2bU2Nsv4kFkCGmJ5TcgrJDy1TPPt2cbjvi7h3E2PXaYJNoMlu4Xbj P26dgr0wQgvN25JuOrrEkFmkKKM169AmFWzZ9NG3hnPCzocTL9ASSVL6vAUrvZm0 RqsQ2Dm3JXLFHwkdQYbgwV7SUvH8dz7Xn1tuI+lKk3izyhU/C2oq4SDuZN/5sdlZ yelZWOnDhQb9AFFsY2O68FOmBn1zohn0RY1YWS2OEEOAZp0vHd8nO89DBlSm02FL PiHkegVnZmPKWHjCFfMipHlytaRhSiByxOYB97eOzOv3OU4LampZFeqT2iwjtQ70 FUV+6B4u1AG5i8f8wY2GI/DZThYuG4Uv1XVG+GWKIlhgiQJODaeBsssBRwiK333z EJWcNEPbYnlPyDW56/YL =ZY+/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4874512.X2Af0rHY8b--