From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4T8v-0007n9-9x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:47:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA1A521C11B; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5880D21C05D for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (213-238-104-87.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.104.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD8511B4005; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:48:19 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: vapier@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants Message-ID: <20110916094819.081dc2c5@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <201109151635.56368.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <28d0b6ed6e38725a08c800899a13145d@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> <201109151635.56368.vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/7ag9AuodKoJB6YKrtBV==Am"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 2977f731250812e737a975ac4ff3d6a6 --Sig_/7ag9AuodKoJB6YKrtBV==Am Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because x86_32 > > x86_64 x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont have different > > keywords for different mips abis (64bit and 32bit ones) >=20 > that'd be nice :) Seems even acceptable. Not sane but acceptable. People tend to keyword packages both '~amd64 ~x86' testing them on amd64 only; amd64 users tend to get sad when someone keyworded a package '~x86' only. On the other hand, it'd be good to have ABI sub-keywords then. Something like 'x86:x86 -*' if a package is actually x86-only. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/7ag9AuodKoJB6YKrtBV==Am Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk5y/0gACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0TvwP9Fh+QKLIdsnhvagnwqi7UXuDX K4jH7j5Vh0T+QA12uHOomi+Zkf4q2k2EWXsZAl87Slw5WqMnnLF4xIT/2/ed1zcU 7jKWgCcS01eJDUL/a4wrpxOd8Hor9L62ZfdUy44M/902w21TUQi25fs5bs8hgjpQ nbVwB1kxEXpfLXBZDzc= =iH71 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7ag9AuodKoJB6YKrtBV==Am--