From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-47612-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1R4FAi-0003Xw-C9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:52:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 266D321C0ED; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1954021C023 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so1829193iae.40 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:51:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lkJDrPE7ETxenNyV7c7GKHvq2PEv6RiYmi2tbpAMMpE=; b=YOlg0du3Udi4MknqN3jt3UIK4I5MHunK4jxVgcJYCPx2N1gFUxhGNJjnydI8wQSJBb 2YJUj6pKuXH7nHuNeJ4isgy1+zqIzLIbd4uNUT7AzV4B0s41NLb7xuc++UzMCX3diiIj V2Dhdy+fKPSLPVmVILi7kVB7X8EWHxrRzt77M= Received: by 10.43.44.195 with SMTP id uh3mr1144906icb.196.1316105500263; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com:587 (74-95-192-101-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [74.95.192.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r2sm5455675ibq.7.2011.09.15.09.51.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.gmail.com:587 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:51:39 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:51:39 -0700 From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting Message-ID: <20110915165139.GC16239@localhost> References: <4E64C7BB.907@gentoo.org> <CA+Nrkpd499zUJiHee2f9wfoCgRiQCO0EXetowbPdWYmMGoaFkA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+NrkpciRbkKUZJfJSMF4gbMwqQEzsJHEkqfmp0ZLzfATSoOmA@mail.gmail.com> <20110907174823.1f4075ff@pomiocik.lan> <4E67F475.8060702@gentoo.org> <20110907235350.2dfcc6c2@snowbell> <20110915093521.19131f15@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110915093521.19131f15@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: d33c10fe1d1b9ffc3df4aaf3cd377bbf On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:53:50 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:47:17 -0400 > > "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > I second the allowing dots in USE flag names. Definitely would be > > > helpful for declaring version related USE flags. > > > > You know you won't be able to mention such flags in the base profile, > > right? At least not for a year or more, until the base profile's eapi > > can be set to something other than 0. > > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, quse > and euse as well. pmerge -pv sys-apps/portage[it.validate.atom.use.flags.just.not.make.conf] ~harring