From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4IjA-00077K-7X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:40:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCA3D21C249; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B5121C325 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504B21B4006 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:37:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-rc4; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <1740055.XA9oyAS8HQ@eve> <1779916.3DFgxt01uS@eve> <20110915221420.0ee3fe16@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110915221420.0ee3fe16@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7669561.HoZ26TYcst"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109151637.30736.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f619c69167ff53e0b242f3eaeb178e55 --nextPart7669561.HoZ26TYcst Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, September 15, 2011 16:14:20 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:03:53 +0200 Joost Roeleveld wrote: > > I'm trying to think of how best to avoid users who are not aware to > > get caught with non-booting systems. >=20 > Guess we could try to detect a few common cases and die in pkg_setup() > whenever the failure is imminent. yeah, no. pkgs shouldnt be divining the properties of the kernel used to b= oot=20 the system and aborting based on their guess. `ewarn` would probably be fine though =2Dmike --nextPart7669561.HoZ26TYcst Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOcmIKAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBUw8QAIC7KPzJUjUD6z7JdmNjWhPq l1roMGSslIvQbcozRvn0YO7ezvmil9iYuLq+qfgc6sZ99gBePEs32o8EZmKzz/fT BoWFxUrUNTIJccLnTHgQlEjOUFCG2oSLOVxgfTB26WeypmoBLuRXJjT2d/2Rku10 dUuz959R666FrDL+Tcz8dJofZgM6k5of7rP9r/0uzepHS1Q8XMKnJyY82MrSQfaU PtN3inTa7F+PT5bRtclGvr33WNmJKBr1RJ61p5QOboNOEuaFiO0Ojfbby8dXWl2k v4ccGokqgmh8EOS831ziwFZ2rH8+e9ElASQdIcOB1w6KChEZLUdbVNQc4L6SlgBn GX8ji4l8e7BQ6D71r1GRfQQOP+Y38+UHgZ9IZos9q7k/14ITCcOgrp/zceA9fKey sOlN4YScqfysQIbLNwWP8rkcsjZcjBkdRdOEDl2e3YsA/JD6Jm52nCiCs+QLFFlJ dZuVJseiPqjUFoJxsKcGkTMdCSqtRrlLc6IYi/Hv2Dl9XBWzGwGaQgeYLoIAbA1y k6RthOXHCF/7hA8wi3Vdt21iM5xlDZf8D06lhKQFhjMwErlJFgOBjmBkb3nj3pch ICRhMLItZH7a//e6G6Tag0qamdJTX9A3OiLrKVmjGcjz064WfNsiwZAenQkiuNTf miNumiclgQ+TL1L4rDLD =BGaS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7669561.HoZ26TYcst--