From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4Ij6-00076x-Gv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:40:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E664921C23C; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE6A21C31A for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002671B4006 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:35:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-rc4; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <28d0b6ed6e38725a08c800899a13145d@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <28d0b6ed6e38725a08c800899a13145d@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2897617.rycUOkHTV6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109151635.56368.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 687b4052605079a78fe1925e579b172e --nextPart2897617.rycUOkHTV6 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, September 15, 2011 16:00:14 Alexey Shvetsov wrote: please dont top post > Is it accepted for merge into kernel mainline for 3.2? no. i was just being optimistic. i'm running 3.1-rc4 atm with a smallish= =20 patch to make it work. > Actualy this abi looks like n32 mips abi. yeah, a lot of the reasons behind the creation of n32 were behind the creat= ion=20 of the x32 abi. > PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because x86_32 x86_64 > x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont have different keywords for > different mips abis (64bit and 32bit ones) that'd be nice :) =2Dmike --nextPart2897617.rycUOkHTV6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOcmGsAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBUrQP/37ZKi0dhClNwicb27ZEUiNo bOvcLQnmI+ZkSzVknqzEBq43GotKRLvx2NZAa1KoCV0BjBsQzlnfhCniyVwErjSI +tWfmywT5kZmmNXkij/DuqlVQxLnOCjCMSmlDg///vZ9PMd/rSpoqq8+gAS5k354 gN4N6gMjfSetlDHWp0w+CGdGLEJYdvOAUEJYggmBBbqdFPYKbcWKtoJRzbttSTBO D/XpaY3E4ZD4MRi8AZ1mk+UtI/mODZ8CeDI30801t11/VfBAYhBpopV5oBT/5NLb baramFICq5AVu9s2/w90JySykS2lczENEeAmdF8z1io7umEWhXuP2or8WMT1GO+e Gk3e12ecRL1LpYq9RxElxxcicRNButmtfwAG3DMrA3Y6CWb4IRLBV8/reV2kMOEu BSk9PRmbQbzF4ygqZ0dUboN9IbaDLl83BXgHAxPvXCrFolLR/R+hoHGx+PGGzfNE KlzW3wik/cJzR1bGJU9T2v7/L4nl1a/zIImpqs5GeC8hE0BaaND/NIXaSegrwnca HXaiCYxVUMfKv6/j29dmciTC+YfaUSkvL7uv36wdu1RvelU4tVHNyDoSazjdxPBG uSn+n/4eD6KlKvlIg88vjNGqLDqGRritFkr+mhDKHOtdlVjcDVkMHd6ObugRbb0y cwMET2iYj/d9j60xB2NT =OOcN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2897617.rycUOkHTV6--