From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R46nu-0004FJ-Pe for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:56:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71D0621C280; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E4021C239 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so2887021wyg.40 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:55:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=iowV1TVtHZd0ORGEiBfOTNiym9YjdMFtbfJChELSCVQ=; b=Lr11l71VX9LzfOxcP/MLLLOsF57MK9TBZRh3agF0TTQ1o/qGd6exrvjfN3wMCIRfqZ IMcMIyIZLz1yw+viHf5DFUTwaMdVfN0TN2eB4+O7FjffNff5HfC0LHlLWM237EcmQLRa iO42gwijHPU86/Vrzb+lb+Ugrt3vaMGNt0+D4= Received: by 10.227.172.73 with SMTP id k9mr110649wbz.30.1316073315782; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo4-0-0-cust780.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [86.4.215.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r27sm7102771wbn.10.2011.09.15.00.55.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:55:08 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting Message-ID: <20110915085508.5134c3dd@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110915093521.19131f15@pomiocik.lan> References: <4E64C7BB.907@gentoo.org> <20110907174823.1f4075ff@pomiocik.lan> <4E67F475.8060702@gentoo.org> <20110907235350.2dfcc6c2@snowbell> <20110915093521.19131f15@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/86D5w5Y//LZ=tWyOi.C.t5N"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a2108fc23795551c583fd153dcbd94da --Sig_/86D5w5Y//LZ=tWyOi.C.t5N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:21 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, quse > and euse as well. Hrm, it's rather disappointing that they're accepted everywhere. That really shouldn't happen... My excuse for Paludis is that I never quite got around to passing in additional flags to validation of names, and dots are legal in exheres-0, so they're currently accepted everywhere. I'll probably get around to fixing that at some point. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/86D5w5Y//LZ=tWyOi.C.t5N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5xr18ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhE8pQCdEtMFoZtpPds6Tiq6YsQpj2W8 TSAAoI4jk7fFBUJU9d2y+N8Zvou4c5JM =Y2k1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/86D5w5Y//LZ=tWyOi.C.t5N--