From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:29:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110915002949.GA16239@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110914191641.GQ31178@comet>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:16:41PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 19:14 Tue 13 Sep , Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:02:28PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > On 17:56 Tue 13 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > useful enough for EAPI ? or should i just stick it into eutils.eclass
> > > > ? OR BOTH !?
> > >
> > > I prefer to avoid EAPI whenever possible, as it just makes things slower
> > > and more complex.
> >
> > Exactly the wrong approach; it winds up with master
> > repositories/overlays cloning the functionality all over the damn
> > place.
>
> Why are people cloning anything if it's in eutils.eclass in gentoo-x86?
There are more repositories than just gentoo-x86, and overlay is *not*
the only configuration in use.
In the old days of the PM only handling a single overlay stack, what
you're suggesting would be less heinous- heinous in detail, but
pragmatic in reality. These days it's a regressive approach-
requiring everyone to slave gentoo-x86 isn't sane, nor is avoiding
eapi (resulting in people having to duplicate code into each
repository stack).
~harring
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-15 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-13 21:56 [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper Mike Frysinger
2011-09-13 22:01 ` Alec Warner
2011-09-13 22:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-13 23:08 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-14 2:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-14 3:04 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-14 3:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-14 3:56 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-14 6:02 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-09-14 14:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-14 2:02 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-14 2:14 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-14 19:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-15 0:29 ` Brian Harring [this message]
2011-09-16 3:00 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-16 9:06 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-16 12:30 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-16 14:04 ` Michał Górny
2011-09-16 17:27 ` Alec Warner
2011-09-16 20:43 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-18 3:59 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-18 11:22 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-19 3:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-20 21:20 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-21 13:11 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-21 16:37 ` Alec Warner
2011-09-23 0:41 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-23 1:04 ` Alec Warner
2011-09-23 1:15 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-17 21:37 ` Zac Medico
2011-09-14 2:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-14 5:34 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-14 19:23 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-14 15:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-21 19:25 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110915002949.GA16239@localhost \
--to=ferringb@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox