From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R1jZA-000603-SU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:43:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CE5721C3A9; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816F721C399 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-253-154-63.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.154.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E110D1B401D; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:43:45 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting Message-ID: <20110908204345.3cd22fda@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110908193303.2c613e9f@googlemail.com> References: <4E64C7BB.907@gentoo.org> <4E68F57C.90002@gentoo.org> <201109082011.02037.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com> <20110908203548.5b0c4726@pomiocik.lan> <20110908193303.2c613e9f@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/1dmvVw2L34bRT3.l6zPG/jG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7c810a6f721c93152ed6b672dcc65a99 --Sig_/1dmvVw2L34bRT3.l6zPG/jG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:33:03 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:35:48 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > PM needs to provide us with a nice ability to handle all that. >=20 > I've yet to see a complete, detailed, accurate description of what > "all that" really is. It's a bit hard to come up with an EAPI > solution when we don't know what the problem is. I wasn't the person suggesting this for EAPI5. I was rather pointing out we're not ready for that. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/1dmvVw2L34bRT3.l6zPG/jG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk5pDOEACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3MKgQAia4vFIzXXKGPwt7jBVg0RVuK 6cvCXdfdFRutrqISqEMMXwpvfyQm8Xzm4gTB2xeai+yOnZuFpezGEPCG3RjdKrjy smwO2byKCYz9zdjGwc6B1T/SDxEkvWtuhkIUWHprqsTa46+sBhYMW7XHnEn+T++H Zsi4Y7gPXAbIRfjyyhY= =/bQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1dmvVw2L34bRT3.l6zPG/jG--