From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QsiAU-0004n0-Kf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:24:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A63921C2CC; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE408E0812 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CA21B4017 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:23:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] subprofiles for ARM architecture Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:23:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E3E7C12.1070402@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2315963.gWqPAO2rDm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108141723.41422.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f7296b7dda843f3fd5869e1ec5b64973 --nextPart2315963.gWqPAO2rDm Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, August 13, 2011 01:41:54 Arun Raghavan wrote: > On 7 August 2011 17:20, Ra=FAl Porcel wrote: > > With subprofiles we could keyword such packages, mask them globally on > > arm and unmask it on the subprofile of the subarchitecture that supports > > it. >=20 > I think this makes sense. What would the policy be on initial keywords > if upstream doesn't explicitly specify what sub-arches are supported? > Just enable on all till someone says it doesn't work or test on all of > them first or ...? we arent talking diff keywords ... there will still be just "arm". the=20 simplest approach is probably fine: don't worry about masking unless someon= e=20 complains or the dev in question feels like digging into things. it's not= =20 like having the package generally available will cause people any additiona= l=20 problems ... =2Dmike --nextPart2315963.gWqPAO2rDm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOSDzdAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBz2gP/RDqir8y7/mPNXH8IJuXLdUx LHsj9G/2nd/rxLeFZNgp5tS+/tV6zNujmgwtvP17JzbrY0CyH9+n8CtXt2uLT3hZ DsKjAyIuYlmBQapOblUDnmld+Cd/jr8nfLnObEOJ/ZJItX0VL5u0oz8YTaB6OH9s xSRyxzl3UDHi9lH7wpz8lAs/dFpl0SjGZJkXHrGueAR4ayvnti3Uca7TFLb4rr63 KLpPgQBgglBC4H0F9nuzTPf3hUjt17BnPzpK4BSGLOuCx+ei8bOZQcQ45XzOoCFN qHFanW/aeCyDjYKYjca1f5PJjmMqls40RlWnPXTxpVxAwA/2nqX1+QIImMt4xp6e aI+6dscN09LVsyme4CVGFcssVEuybX0eZ5RAONcdW3CK617e2Edz9xXEkWC4fgPu r5yy8jYj+H/tecHnRrOrFX4sYOmt0fTU2dpYVLb2IwigHCs0kI8C+VMUtTdc+I3B Ft5lqWMUTsbq1h6vHvUJ+EyyWOzxcH3qitb+BWfd/xKBtbTOGDtoFIaj3fsoXjbl hYTU9xqYhOgwaUhw4UuAT+9NSGOEU9mz25Y9feXKbn1Ubg6uJMs7RF3zNDoZupBZ nsInubEaJetCXarJRUfF95ElxEUKf3dWTr8KcHlOFrnzr+cr6yXbWcADVObI+e/W JPGScTqKek+wmxUECKJT =80Wj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2315963.gWqPAO2rDm--